Compoli et al v. Digital Concrete Imaging, Inc. et al
Cardinal Cory, Timothy Compoli and Cory Cardinal |
Bacheller Bryan, Digital Concrete Imaging, Inc. and Bryan W. Bacheller |
Mark A. Hanley |
8:2020cv00844 |
April 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Virginia M Hernandez Covington |
Thomas G Wilson |
Labor: Fair Standards |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Florin, Wolfgang) |
Filing 27 MEDIATION report Hearing held on June 5, 2020. Hearing outcome: Impasse. (Florin, Wolfgang) |
Filing 26 RESPONSE in Opposition re #18 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by Cory Cardinal, Timothy Compoli. (Florin, Wolfgang) |
Filing 25 VERIFIED summary by Bryan W. Bacheller, Digital Concrete Imaging, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Mackey, Peter) |
Filing 24 ANSWER to court interrogatories re: #10 Order by Cory Cardinal. (Florin, Wolfgang) |
Filing 23 ANSWER to court interrogatories re: 21 Order no pdf, #10 Order by Timothy Compoli. (Florin, Wolfgang) |
Filing 22 ENDORSED ORDER: Although the Court usually does not allow mediation by telephone or video conference, see Local Rule 9.05(c), the Court will permit the parties to conduct the June 5 mediation by video. Participation by telephone will not satisfy the personal attendance requirement unless, in the discretion of the mediator, participation by video is infeasible due to circumstances beyond the control of the parties and their counsel. The parties must notify the mediator reasonably in advance of the mediation that it will take place by video to enable the mediator to prepare satisfactorily. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/27/2020. (DMD) |
Filing 21 ENDORSED ORDER: The parties have chosen to mediate on June 5, 2020. (Doc. #19). However, as explained in the Scheduling Order, "the parties are not permitted to mediate until the information exchange outlined in this Order, including answers to interrogatories and Verified Summary, has been completed." (Doc. #10 at 3). Therefore, the Court reminds the parties that their answers to interrogatories and verified summary must be filed on the docket by June 4, 2020, at the latest. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/26/2020. (DMD) |
Filing 20 ORDER appointing Mark Hanley as mediator in this action. The mediation conference is scheduled for June 5, 2020, at 9:00 AM. The Court directs that all counsel, parties, corporate representatives, and any other required claims professionals shall be present at the mediation conference with full authority to negotiate a settlement. The Court does not allow mediation by telephone or video conference. Personal attendance is required. See Local Rule 9.05(c). Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/26/2020. (DMD) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of mediation conference/hearing to be held on June 5, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. before Mark A. Hanley. (Florin, Wolfgang) |
Filing 18 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint by Bryan W. Bacheller, Digital Concrete Imaging, Inc. (Mackey, Peter) |
Filing 17 ENDORSED ORDER: On April 17, 2020, the Court entered its scheduling order, setting a mediation deadline of July 6, 2020. (Doc. #10). Now, the parties have filed a notice of mediation, purportedly scheduling the mediation for July 8 - two days after the mediation deadline. (Doc. #16). Accordingly, the Court rejects the notice of mediation. Plaintiffs are directed to file a notice of mediation setting mediation for a date within the mediation deadline by May 26, 2020. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/21/2020. (DMD) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of mediation conference/hearing to be held on July 8, 2020 at 1:00 p.m. before Mark A. Hanley. (Florin, Wolfgang) |
Filing 15 ENDORSED ORDER: In light of the amended complaint (Doc. #14), the motion to dismiss (Doc. #13) is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/8/2020. (DMD) |
Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand. filed by Timothy Compoli. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Timothy Compoli, Cardinal Cory. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Florin, Wolfgang) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss by Bacheller Bryan, Digital Concrete Imaging, Inc. (Mackey, Peter) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter J. Mackey on behalf of Bacheller Bryan, Digital Concrete Imaging, Inc. (Mackey, Peter) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Timothy Compoli, Cardinal Cory. Related case(s): yes (Florin, Wolfgang) |
Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER: The parties are directed to adhere to the Court's Scheduling Order. This action is hereby referred to Mark A. Hanley, Esq., for mediation. The parties must mediate no later than July 6, 2020. Lead Counsel shall file a notice of mediation informing the Court as to the date, time, and location of mediation by May 20, 2020. Neither party may reschedule or cancel the mediation conference once it is set; leave of Court must be obtained before the mediation conference may be rescheduled or cancelled. The parties shall not mediate until the information exchange outlined in the Scheduling Order is completed. Absent compelling circumstances and leave of Court, lead counsel must appear at the mediation conference. Lead Counsel shall file a notice informing the Court as to the results of mediation within 24 hours of the mediation conference. In the event mediation results in an impasse, the parties must file their jointly-prepared fast-track case management report within 24 hours of the mediation conference. Upon review of the jointly-prepared case management report, the Court will determine whether a case management hearing is necessary. If a case management hearing is necessitated, the Court will set the hearing by separate notice. Furthermore, if mediation results in an impasse, the Court intends to schedule this action for trial within 90-120 days from the mediation conference. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 4/17/2020. (SKP) |
Filing 9 RETURN of service executed on 4-15-2020 by Timothy Compoli, Cardinal Cory as to Bacheller Bryan. (Florin, Wolfgang) |
Filing 8 RETURN of service executed on 4-15-2020 by Timothy Compoli, Cardinal Cory as to Digital Concrete Imaging, Inc.. (Florin, Wolfgang) |
Filing 7 ***TERMINATED, contacted counsel to refile using proper event.***PROOF of service by Timothy Compoli, Cardinal Cory. (Florin, Wolfgang) |
Filing 6 ***TERMINATED, contacted counsel to refile using proper event.***PROOF of service by Timothy Compoli, Cardinal Cory. (Florin, Wolfgang) |
Filing 5 ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to effect service of process as required by Rule 4, Fed. R. Civ. P., and file proof thereof with the Court as soon as service has been effected. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 4/15/2020. (SKP) |
Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 4/15/2020. (SKP) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Bacheller Bryan, Digital Concrete Imaging, Inc. (MCB) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington and Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. New case number: 8:20-cv-844-T-33TGW. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-16696721) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Florin, Wolfgang) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.