Sutton v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Mason Sutton
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Case Number: 8:2020cv00915
Filed: April 21, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Charlene Edwards Honeywell
Referring Judge: Christopher P Tuite
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge #6 is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this Order for all purposes, including appellate review. Plaintiff's Affidavit of Indigency #2, construed as a motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Plaintiff is directed to pay the Clerk's filing fee within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order. Failure to pay the filing fee within this time frame may result in a dismissal of this action without further notice. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 6/1/2020. (BGS)
May 18, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #5 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Mason Sutton. Related case(s): no (Steinberg, Michael)
May 12, 2020 Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency filed by Mason Sutton. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite on 5/12/2020. (MJP)
April 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 5/6/2020. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 4/22/2020. (BGS)
April 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/2010. (TDC)
April 21, 2020 Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:20-cv-915-T-36CPT. Motion(s) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency . Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. (SJB)
April 21, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Mason Sutton. (Steinberg, Michael)
April 21, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Mason Sutton. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)(Steinberg, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sutton v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mason Sutton
Represented By: Michael Alan Steinberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?