Goodall v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. et al
| Rebbecca Goodall and Rebecca Schwartz |
| Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., Capital One Services, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Equifax Information Services, LLC |
| 8:2020cv00998 |
| April 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Thomas P Barber |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 5/8/2020. (SRC)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (TDC) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Thomas P. Barber and Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:20-cv-998-T-60AAS. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-16759796) filed by Rebbecca Goodall. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons as to Capital One, #3 Proposed Summons as to Experian, #4 Proposed Summons as to Equifax, #5 Exhibit A, #6 Exhibit B, #7 Exhibit C, #8 Exhibit D, #9 Exhibit E, #10 Exhibit F, #11 Exhibit G)(McEleney, Sean) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
