Walker v. Pinellas County Jail Office et al
| Jamal R. Walker |
| Pinellas County Jail Office and Hanson |
| 8:2020cv01027 |
| May 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER dismissing case. Plaintiff's complaint #1 is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, in a new case, with a new case number. If Plaintiff elects to file a new complaint, he must either pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 5/18/2020. (BGS)
|
|
Filing 2
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 5/26/2020. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 5/12/2020. (BGS)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hanson, Pinellas County Jail Office filed by Jamal R. Walker. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(Filing Fee Not Paid - No IFP Motion Filed.)(CRH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
