Walker v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
| Matthew Walker |
| Equifax Information Services LLC, Verizon Wireless Services, LLC and Equifax Information Services, LLC |
| 8:2020cv01166 |
| May 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sean P Flynn |
| Mary S Scriven |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ENDORSED ORDER GRANTING #13 Defendant Verizon Wireless Services, LLC's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant Verizon Wireless Services, LLC shall have up to and including July 21, 2020 to file its answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 7/1/2020. (APF)
|
|
Filing 14
ENDORSED ORDER GRANTING #10 Consent Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC shall have up to and including July 21, 2020 to file its answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 6/30/2020. (APF)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by Verizon Wireless Services, LLC. (Rubio, Armando) Modified event type on 6/30/2020 (CTR). |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of pendency of related cases Notice of Pendency of Other Actions per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Equifax Information Services, LLC. Related case(s): No (Meier, Alexander) |
| Filing 11 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Equifax Information Services, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Equifax Inc. for Equifax Information Services, LLC.. (Meier, Alexander) |
| Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint Consent Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Meier, Alexander) |
| Filing 9 RETURN of service executed on June 8, 2020 by Matthew Walker as to Verizon Wireless Services, LLC. (Bonan, Thomas) |
| Filing 8 RETURN of service executed on June 9, 2020 by Matthew Walker as to Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Bonan, Thomas) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Interested persons order by Matthew Walker. (Bonan, Thomas) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Matthew Walker. Related case(s): no (Bonan, Thomas) |
|
Filing 5
INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 6/5/2020. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 5/22/2020. (KAC)
|
|
Filing 4
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 6/5/2020. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 5/22/2020. (KAC)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Equifax Information Services, LLC, Verizon Wireless Services, LLC. (TDC) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Mary S. Scriven and Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. New case number: 8:20-cv-1166-T-35SPF. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-16828589) filed by Matthew Walker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons)(Bonan, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
