Danforth v. NAV Advisors, Inc. et al
| Laynie Danforth |
| Marc Korsch and NAV Advisors, Inc. |
| Mark A. Hanley |
| 8:2020cv01171 |
| May 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Virginia M Hernandez Covington |
| Thomas G Wilson |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Laynie Danforth. (Rothman, Bradley) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Laynie Danforth. Related case(s): yes (Rothman, Bradley) |
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: The parties are directed to adhere to the Court's Scheduling Order. This action is hereby referred to Mark A. Hanley, Esq., for mediation. The parties must mediate no later than September 25, 2020. Lead Counsel shall file a notice of mediation informing the Court as to the date, time, and location of mediation by August 10, 2020. Neither party may reschedule or cancel the mediation conference once it is set; leave of Court must be obtained before the mediation conference may be rescheduled or cancelled. The parties shall not mediate until the information exchange outlined in the Scheduling Order is completed. Absent compelling circumstances and leave of Court, lead counsel must appear at the mediation conference. Lead Counsel shall file a notice informing the Court as to the results of mediation within 24 hours of the mediation conference. In the event mediation results in an impasse, the parties must file their jointly-prepared fast-track case management report within 24 hours of the mediation conference. Upon review of the jointly-prepared case management report, the Court will determine whether a case management hearing is necessary. If a case management hearing is necessitated, the Court will set the hearing by separate notice. Furthermore, if mediation results in an impasse, the Court intends to schedule this action for trial within 90-120 days from the mediation conference. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 6/3/2020. (SKP)
|
| Filing 7 WAIVER of service returned executed on May 27, 2020 by Laynie Danforth as to Marc Korsch. (Rothman, Bradley) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER of service returned executed on May 27, 2020 by Laynie Danforth as to NAV Advisors, Inc. (Rothman, Bradley) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to effect service of process as required by Rule 4, Fed. R. Civ. P., and file proof thereof with the Court as soon as service has been effected. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/22/2020. (SKP)
|
|
Filing 4
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/22/2020. (SKP)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Marc Korsch, NAV Advisors, Inc. (TDC) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington and Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. New case number: 8:20-cv-1171-T-33TGW. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Marc Korsch, NAV Advisors, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-16833500) filed by Laynie Danforth. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons)(Rothman, Bradley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
