Torres et al v. Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff: Ariel Torres and Raphyr Lubin
Defendant: Starbucks Coffee Company and Starbucks Corporation
Case Number: 8:2020cv01311
Filed: June 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Charlene Edwards Honeywell
Referring Judge: Thomas G Wilson
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1161
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 4, 2020 Filing 18 Second MOTION to Compel Arbitration of Plaintiffs' Individual Claims and Dismiss Plaintiffs' Class Action Claim and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Starbucks Coffee Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Mederos, Stefanie) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson.
July 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting #12 Defendant's Motion to Set Aside Clerk's Default. The Clerk is directed to set aside the Clerk's Entry of Default at Dkt. 11. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on 7/28/2020. (DMS)
July 21, 2020 Filing 16 RESPONSE to Motion re #12 MOTION to Set Aside Clerk Default filed by Ariel Torres. (Hill, Brandon)
July 21, 2020 Filing 15 AMENDED COMPLAINT (CLASS ACTION) for Statutory Damages and Injunctive Relief against Starbucks Coffee Company filed by Ariel Torres. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Ariel Torres.(Hill, Brandon)
July 10, 2020 Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Interested persons order by Starbucks Coffee Company. (Colombo, Sherrill)
July 8, 2020 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Sherrill May Colombo on behalf of Starbucks Coffee Company (Colombo, Sherrill)
July 7, 2020 Filing 12 MOTION to Set Aside Clerk Default by Starbucks Coffee Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Exhibit A - Declaration, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Motion to Compel, #3 Exhibit MTC Exhibit 1 - Declaration, #4 Exhibit MTC Decl. Ex. A, #5 Exhibit MTC Decl. Ex. B, #6 Exhibit MTC Decl. Ex. C, #7 Exhibit MTC Decl. Ex. D, #8 Exhibit MTC Decl. Ex. E, #9 Exhibit MTC Decl. Ex. F, #10 Exhibit MTC Decl. Ex. G, #11 Exhibit MTC Decl. Ex. H, #12 Exhibit MTC Decl. Ex. I)(Mederos, Stefanie)
July 6, 2020 Filing 11 SET ASIDE, PURSUANT TO ORDER #17 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Starbucks Coffee Company. (DG) Modified on 7/29/2020 (DG).
July 3, 2020 Filing 10 MOTION for Clerk's Default against Starbucks Coffee Company by Ariel Torres. (Hill, Brandon) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson.
June 30, 2020 Filing 9 RETURN of service executed on June 10, 2020 by Ariel Torres as to Starbucks Coffee Company. (Hill, Brandon)
June 23, 2020 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Interested persons order by Ariel Torres. (Hill, Brandon)
June 23, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Ariel Torres. Related case(s): no (Hill, Brandon)
June 10, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Chad A. Justice on behalf of Ariel Torres (Justice, Chad)
June 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER. Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 6/23/2020. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 6/9/2020. (BGS)
June 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 6/23/2020. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 6/9/2020. (BGS)
June 9, 2020 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Starbucks Coffee Company. (MCB)
June 9, 2020 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. New case number: 8:20-cv-1311-T-36TGW. (SJB)
June 8, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Class Action) against Starbucks Coffee Company (Filing Fee $400, Receipt # 113A-16909368) filed by Ariel Torres. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Hill, Brandon) Modified on 6/9/2020 to correct docket text (SJB).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Torres et al v. Starbucks Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starbucks Coffee Company
Represented By: Sherrill May Colombo
Represented By: Stefanie M. Mederos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ariel Torres
Represented By: Brandon J. Hill
Represented By: Luis A. Cabassa
Represented By: Chad A. Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raphyr Lubin
Represented By: Brandon J. Hill
Represented By: Luis A. Cabassa
Represented By: Chad A. Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?