Smith v. Bekins Van Lines, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Douglas Smith and Amey Smith
Defendant: Bekins Van Lines, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2020cv01383
Filed: June 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Mary S Scriven
Referring Judge: Julie S Sneed
Nature of Suit: Commerce ICC Rates, Etc.
Cause of Action: 49 U.S.C. ยง 14706
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Pretrial statement due by 8/30/2021. Bench Trial set for the October 2021 trial term, which commences on 10/4/2021, with a more precise date to follow. Conduct mediation hearing by 1/5/2021. Lead counsel to coordinate dates. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 8/6/2020. (KAC)
July 28, 2020 Filing 17 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Roth, Heidi)
July 27, 2020 Filing 16 MEMORANDUM in opposition re #13 Reply to Response to Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike filed by Defendant filed by Amey Smith, Douglas Smith. (Lowther, Bailey)
July 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ENDORSED ORDER GRANTING #14 Plaintiffs' Motion to File Sur-Reply to Defendant's Reply Regarding Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike (Unopposed). Plaintiff shall have up to and including July 27, 2020 to file a Sur-Reply, which shall not exceed five (5) pages. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 7/20/2020. (APF)
July 15, 2020 Filing 14 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically Leave to File Sur-Reply to Defendant's Reply Regarding Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike by All Plaintiffs. (Lowther, Bailey)
July 15, 2020 Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion re #2 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by Bekins Van Lines, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Roth, Heidi)
July 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ENDORSED ORDER GRANTING 28 Defendant's Motion to File a Reply to Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Pending [Motion to] Dismiss and Motion to Strike (Unopposed). Defendant shall have up to and including fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order to file a Reply, which shall not exceed five (5) pages. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 7/7/2020. (APF)
July 2, 2020 Filing 11 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Leave to File Other Document: Reply by Bekins Van Lines, Inc. (Roth, Heidi) Modified text on 7/9/2020 (AG).
July 1, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Amey Smith, Douglas Smith. Related case(s): yes (Lowther, Bailey)
July 1, 2020 Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Interested persons order by Amey Smith, Douglas Smith. (Lowther, Bailey)
June 30, 2020 Filing 8 RESPONSE to Motion re #2 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by Amey Smith, Douglas Smith. (Lowther, Bailey)
June 29, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Bekins Van Lines, Inc.. Related case(s): yes (Roth, Heidi)
June 29, 2020 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Interested persons order by Bekins Van Lines, Inc.. (Roth, Heidi)
June 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 7/2/2020. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 6/18/2020. (SKP)
June 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 7/2/2020. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 6/18/2020. (SKP)
June 16, 2020 Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Mary S. Scriven and Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. New case number: 8:20-cv-1383-T-35JSS. (SJB)
June 16, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint by Bekins Van Lines, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Bill of Lading, #2 Exhibit Brochure)(Roth, Heidi) Modified on 6/16/2020 (TDC).
June 16, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from the Twelfth Judicial Circuit, in and for Sarasota County, Florida, case number 2020-CA-002299 filed in State Court on May 27, 2020. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 113A-16941678 filed by Bekins Van Lines, Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 Amended State Court COMPLAINT, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 State Court Other Documents, #5 State Court Other Documents, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Roth, Heidi) Modified on 6/16/2020 (TDC).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Bekins Van Lines, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bekins Van Lines, Inc.
Represented By: Heidi M. Roth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Douglas Smith
Represented By: Bailey Lowther
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amey Smith
Represented By: Bailey Lowther
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?