Patel et al v. Sahni et al
NEELAM PATEL, MEDIFIELD STAFFING, INC. and Delaware Physician Corp. |
SANJIV SAHNI and DINOWITZ & BOVE CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS, P.C. |
8:2020cv01392 |
June 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
James S Moody |
Christopher P Tuite |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ENDORSED ORDER granting #12 Plaintiffs' Agreed Motion to Extend Deadlines to Prepare and File Case Management Report. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 7/28/2020. (SMB) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Case Management Report Plaintiffs' Agreed Motion to Extend Deadlines to Prepare and File Case Management Report by All Plaintiffs. (Brouillet, Adam) |
Filing 11 ORDER: Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendant Dinowitz & Bove Certified Public Accountants, P.C.'s ("Dinowitz") Second, Third, Seventh, and Eighth Affirmative Defenses (Dkt. #10) is DENIED. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 7/16/2020. (SMB) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Strike #7 Answer to Complaint Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendant Dinowitz & Bove Certified Public Accountants, P.C.'s Second, Third, Seventh and Eighth Affirmative Defenses by All Plaintiffs. (Brouillet, Adam) |
Filing 9 ***TERMINATED-INCORRECT EVENT - COUNSEL TO REFILE WITH CORRECT EVENT***NOTICE of lis pendens by Dinowitz & Bove Certified Public Accountants, P.C. (Scott, Alvin) Modified on 7/6/2020 (LSS). |
Filing 8 NOTICE of pendency of related cases Plaintiffs' Notice of Pendency of Other Actions per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Delaware Physician Corp., Medifield Staffing, Inc., Neelam Patel. Related case(s): no (Brouillet, Adam) |
Filing 7 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint by Dinowitz & Bove Certified Public Accountants, P.C..(Scott, Alvin) |
Filing 6 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 6/19/2020. (SMB) |
Filing 5 NOTICE by Dinowitz & Bove Certified Public Accountants, P.C., Sanjiv Sahni re #1 Notice of Removal (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit)(McDonough, Sean) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Dinowitz & Bove Certified Public Accountants, P.C., Sanjiv Sahni re #1 Notice of Removal (Scott, Alvin) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to counsel Alvin Donald Scott, Jr. of Local Rule 1.05(e), which states - The Clerk is authorized and directed to require a complete and executed AO Form JS44, Civil Cover Sheet, which shall accompany each civil case as a condition to the filing thereof. State and federal prisoners, and other persons filing civil cases pro se are exempt from the requirements of this subsection. File a completed Civil Cover Sheet using the event Notice (Other) (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MCB) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:20-cv-1392-T-30CPT. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pasco County, case number 2020-CA-000297 filed in State Court on 01/31/2020. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 113A-16945858) filed by All Defendants (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Exhibit)(Scott, Alvin) Modified on 6/17/2020 (MCB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.