Koehn v. Mizzen and Main LLC
| Wanda Koehn |
| Mizzen and Main LLC |
| Peter J. Grilli |
| 8:2020cv01812 |
| August 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Virginia M Hernandez Covington |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ENDORSED ORDER: On the basis of the Notice of Settlement (Doc. #17), this cause is hereby dismissed, without prejudice and subject to the right of the parties, within 60 days of the date hereof, to submit a stipulated form of final order or judgment, or request an extension of time, should they so choose or for any party to move to reopen the action, upon good cause being shown. After that 60 day period, however, without further order, this dismissal shall be deemed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate any previously scheduled deadlines and thereafter close this case. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 9/22/2020. (AR)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of settlement by Wanda Koehn (Hannah, Roderick) |
|
Filing 16
ENDORSED ORDER: The parties' notice of mediation was due September 18, 2020. (Doc. #9). However, no notice has yet been filed. The parties are directed to file a notice of mediation by September 25, 2020. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 9/21/2020. (AR)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE by Wanda Koehn of Filing Plaintiff's Responses to Court Interrogatories. (Hannah, Roderick) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan A. Beckerman on behalf of Mizzen and Main LLC. (Beckerman, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 13
ENDORSED ORDER: Defendant Mizzen and Main, LLC's unopposed Motion for Extension is granted in part. (Doc. #11). Although the Court appreciates that Mizzen and Main may need an extension due to an internal oversight, a 21-day extension is more appropriate. Response now due September 25, 2020. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 9/10/2020. (AR)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Taylor Perre on behalf of Mizzen and Main LLC. (Perre, Christopher) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Complaint by Mizzen and Main LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Perre, Christopher) |
|
Filing 10
ENDORSED ORDER: On August 14, 2020, Plaintiff Wanda Koehn served Defendant Mizzen and Main LLC. (Doc. #8). Mizzen and Main's answer was due on September 4, 2020. But no answer has been filed and Koehn has not promptly applied to the Clerk for entry of default pursuant to Local Rule 1.07(b). Accordingly, Koehn is directed to show cause by September 15, 2020, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Local Rule 3.10(a). Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 9/8/2020. (AR)
|
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: The parties are directed to adhere to the Court's Scheduling Order. This action is hereby referred to Peter J. Grilli, Esq., for mediation. The parties must mediate no later than November 18, 2020. Lead Counsel shall file a notice of mediation informing the Court as to the date, time, and location of mediation by September 18, 2020. Neither party may reschedule or cancel the mediation conference once it is set; leave of Court must be obtained before the mediation conference may be rescheduled or cancelled. The parties shall not mediate until the information exchange outlined in the Scheduling Order is completed. Absent compelling circumstances and leave of Court, lead counsel must appear at the mediation conference. Lead Counsel shall file a notice informing the Court as to the results of mediation within 24 hours of the mediation conference. In the event mediation results in an impasse, the parties must file their jointly-prepared fast-track case management report within 24 hours of the mediation conference. Upon review of the jointly-prepared case management report, the Court will determine whether a case management hearing is necessary. If a case management hearing is necessitated, the Court will set the hearing by separate notice. Furthermore, if mediation results in an impasse, the Court intends to schedule this action for trial within 90-120 days from the mediation conference. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 8/25/2020. (TWL)
|
| Filing 8 RETURN of service executed on 8/14/20020 by Wanda Koehn as to Mizzen and Main LLC. (Hannah, Roderick) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Wanda Koehn. Related case(s): N (Hannah, Roderick) |
| Filing 6 Entered in error.(TWL) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to effect service of process as required by Rule 4, Fed. R. Civ. P., and file proof thereof with the Court as soon as service has been effected. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 8/7/2020. (TWL)
|
|
Filing 4
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 8/7/2020. (TWL)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Mizzen and Main LLC. (CRH) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:20-cv-1812-T-33AEP. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mizzen and Main LLC (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-17146042) filed by Wanda Koehn. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Proposed Summons)(Hannah, Roderick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
