United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
| EEOC and United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. |
| Cassandra Jerome |
| 8:2020cv02128 |
| September 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| James S Moody |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 First INTERVENOR COMPLAINT Intervenor Complaint vs Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. filed by Cassandra Jerome.(Sheslow, William) |
Filing 17
ENDORSED ORDER granting #16 Cassandra Jermone's Unopposed Motion to Intervene as Plaintiff. The Intervenor Plaintiff shall separately file her complaint. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 10/28/2020. (SMB)
|
| Filing 16 First MOTION to Intervene Unopposed Motion to Intervene by Cassandra Jerome. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Intervenor's Complaint)(Sheslow, William) |
| Filing 15 First Amended ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc..(Turner, Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 14
ENDORSED ORDER granting #12 Motion for Hee Won Choi to appear pro hac vice on behalf of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. Signed by Senior Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 10/8/2020. (SMB)
|
|
Filing 13
ENDORSED ORDER granting #11 Motion for Elizabeth Bulat Turner to appear pro hac vice on behalf of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. Signed by Senior Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 10/8/2020. (SMB)
|
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Hee Won Choi to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. 113A-17403606 for $150 by Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.. (Kessler, Gary) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. |
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Elizabeth Bulat Turner to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. 113A-17403563 for $150 by Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.. (Kessler, Gary) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. |
| Filing 10 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.(Kessler, Gary) Modified text on 10/6/2020 (BSN). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Gary R. Kessler on behalf of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (Kessler, Gary) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. Related case(s): no (Kessler, Gary). |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Gary R. Kessler on behalf of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (Kessler, Gary) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Meredith, Brandi) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Related case(s): no (Meredith, Brandi) |
|
Filing 4
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 9/11/2020. (KAC)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CRH) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:20-cv-2128-T-30AEP. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. with Jury Demand filed by EEOC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Meredith, Brandi) Modified on 9/11/2020 (CRH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
