Thompson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Thompson
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Case Number: 8:2020cv02236
Filed: September 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: William F Jung
Referring Judge: Julie S Sneed
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Title XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SUMMONS returned executed by Jeffrey Thompson. Commissioner of Social Security served on 10/20/2020, answer due 12/21/2020. (LYB)
November 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 PROOF of service as to the Office of Regional Chief Counsel on 10/26/2020 (LYB)
November 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 PROOF of service as to the Attorney General on 10/26/2020 (LYB)
October 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (JLD)
September 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #5 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Jeffrey Thompson. Related case(s): no (Steinberg, Michael)
September 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on September 25, 2020. (TLM)
September 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 9/25/2020. (SAO)
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 07/23/2010. (JLD)
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge William F. Jung and Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. New case number: 8:20-cv-2236-T-02JSS. Motion(s) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency . Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. (SJB)
September 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Jeffrey Thompson. (Steinberg, Michael)
September 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Jeffrey Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)(Steinberg, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thompson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Thompson
Represented By: Michael Alan Steinberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?