Young v. Lifefleet Southeast, Inc.
Solomon K Young and Solomon K. Young |
Lifefleet Southeast, Inc. doing business as American Medical Response |
8:2020cv02246 |
September 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Thomas P Barber |
Sean P Flynn |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #6 Related case order and track 2 notice by Solomon K. Young identifying Other Affiliate b.Jack And Jill Residential Services Corporation for Solomon K. Young.. (Kelly, Charlotte) |
Filing 14 ENDORSED ORDER granting #13 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney John M. Barr may appear pro hac vice on behalf of Defendant, with Attorney Monica Williams Harris designated as local counsel pursuant to Local Rule 2.02(a). Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, counsel shall comply with the electronic filing requirements and file a notice of compliance with said requirements. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn on 11/5/2020. (CKR) |
Filing 13 MOTION for John M. Barr to appear pro hac vice by Lifefleet Southeast, Inc.. (Harris, Monica) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. |
***PRO HAC VICE FEES paid by attorney John M. Barr (Filing fee $150 receipt number TPA062357.). (ARC) |
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #6 Related case order and track 2 notice by Lifefleet Southeast, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent American Medical Response, Inc. (AMR), Corporate Parent Global Medical Response, Inc., Corporate Parent AMR Holdco, Inc. for Lifefleet Southeast, Inc... (Harris, Monica) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Lifefleet Southeast, Inc.. Related case(s): Yes (Harris, Monica) |
Filing 10 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by Lifefleet Southeast, Inc..(Harris, Monica) |
Filing 9 IMAGE REMOVED - PER COUNSEL, INCORRECT DOCUMENT ATTACHED. Counsel will refile. ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by Lifefleet Southeast, Inc..(Harris, Monica) Modified on 10/19/2020 (SRC). |
Filing 8 ENDORSED ORDER: "Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond or Otherwise Plead to Plaintiff's Complaint" (Doc. #7) is granted. Defendant may file its response on or before October 19, 2020. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 10/17/2020. (EKB) |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by Lifefleet Southeast, Inc.. (Harris, Monica) |
Filing 6 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 10/1/2020. (SRC) |
Filing 5 TERMIANTED. PROOF of service by Solomon K. Young (Kelly, Charlotte) NOTE: Incorrect event code, counsel notified to refile as Summons Returned Executed. Modified on 10/1/2020 (LD). |
Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Lifefleet Southeast, Inc. (CRH) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Solomon K Young. (Kelly, Charlotte) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Thomas P. Barber and Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. New case number: 8:20-cv-2246-T-60SPF. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages and Equitable Relief against Lifefleet Southeast, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-17351061) filed by Solomon K Young. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet employment race discrimination)(Kelly, Charlotte) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.