Pennett v. Fortinet, Inc.
Jeffrey Pennett |
Fortinet, Inc. |
8:2020cv02260 |
September 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
James S Moody |
Christopher P Tuite |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ENDORSED ORDER granting #10 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant's time to file an answer is extended to December 3, 2020. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 10/28/2020. (SMB) |
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint Through and Including December 3, 2020 by Fortinet, Inc.. (Wenter, Billie) |
Filing 9 ENDORSED ORDER granting #8 Motion for Counsel to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Within 10 days hereof, Attorney Bille D. Wenter shall complete the e-filer registration form (available at http://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/special-admission-practice). Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite on 10/23/2020. (AHA) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Billie D. Wenter to appear pro hac vice ($150 paid - Receipt No. 113A-17424618, 10/14/2020) by Fortinet, Inc.. (Puggina, Daniela) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. |
Filing 7 APPEARANCE of non-resident counsel and designation of local counsel by Daniela Fonseca Puggina on behalf of Fortinet, Inc.. Local Counsel: Daniela Fonseca Puggina. Non-Resident Counsel: Billie D. Wenter. (Puggina, Daniela) |
FEE PAID. Fee for pro hac vice appearance, Receipt No. 113A-17424618 for $150 paid. Special Admission for Non-Resident Attorney Billie D. Wenter. (Puggina, Daniela) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Fortinet, Inc.. Related case(s): yes (Puggina, Daniela) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Jeffrey Pennett. Related case(s): yes (Florin, Wolfgang) |
Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 9/28/2020. (KAC) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Fortinet, Inc. (JLD) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:20-cv-2260-T-30CPT. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fortinet, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-17355871) filed by Jeffrey Pennett. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Florin, Wolfgang) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pennett v. Fortinet, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Fortinet, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Billie D. Wenter |
Represented By: | Daniela Fonseca Puggina |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Pennett | |
Represented By: | Wolfgang M. Florin |
Represented By: | Christopher D. Gray |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.