Sheldon v. Golden Sheldon et al
| Steve Sheldon |
| Ashley Moody, Sarasota Sheriff's Department, De Facto Sarasota Leadership, Rabbi Mendy, Tuck, Debbie Morris, Donna Berlin, Former State of Florida, Charles E. Roberts, Sarasota, FL, David Denkin, Sheri Marie Golden Sheldon, Manatee County Sheriff's Department and Jason Powell |
| 8:2020cv02526 |
| October 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Thomas P Barber |
| Sean P Flynn |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 11/5/2020. (SRC)
|
| Filing 4 (INCORRECT EVENT USED - Image removed and will be refiled under correct event) RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Modified on 11/5/2020 (SRC). |
| Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Steve Sheldon. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn on 11/2/2020. (CKR) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Steve Sheldon. (MAA) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Steve Sheldon. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(MAA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
