Toran v. Hyundai Motor America Corporation
George Toran, Jr. |
Hyundai Motor America Corporation |
8:2020cv02669 |
November 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
William F Jung |
Christopher P Tuite |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 MOTION to Stay re #18 MOTION to Change Venue / Transfer Case or in the Alternative, Stay Proceedings by Hyundai Motor America Corporation. (Raiford, Anitra) |
![]() |
Filing 20 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Respond to Complaint by Hyundai Motor America Corporation. (Raiford, Anitra) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of TELEPHONIC HEARING on #18 MOTION to Change Venue / Transfer Case. Motion Hearing set for 1/26/2021 at 09:30 AM before Judge William F. Jung. Counsel are directed to call the reserved conference toll free number at 1-888-557-8511. Enter the access code: 4744914 followed by the # (pound) key. You will be prompted to enter the security code: 2669 followed by the # (pound) key. Please call in at least 10 minutes before the scheduled hearing. (CCB) |
Filing 18 MOTION to Change Venue / Transfer Case or in the Alternative, Stay Proceedings by Hyundai Motor America Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Raiford, Anitra) |
![]() |
Filing 16 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Deadline to Respond to Complaint by Hyundai Motor America Corporation. (Raiford, Anitra) |
![]() |
Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Rachel A. Straus to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. 113A-17664665 for $150 by Hyundai Motor America Corporation. (Raiford, Anitra) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. |
Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for Amir Nassihi to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. 113A-17664611 for $150 by Hyundai Motor America Corporation. (Raiford, Anitra) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. |
Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Michael L. Mallow to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. 113A-17664502 for $150 by Hyundai Motor America Corporation. (Raiford, Anitra) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Kurt D. Mitchell on behalf of George Toran, Jr (Mitchell, Kurt) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice by Hyundai Motor America Corporation. (Raiford, Anitra) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Hyundai Motor America Corporation. (Raiford, Anitra) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by George Toran, Jr. (Bolliger, Aldo) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by George Toran, Jr. Related case(s): No (Bolliger, Aldo) |
![]() |
Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Hyundai Motor America Corporation. (Raiford, Anitra) |
![]() |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Hyundai Motor America Corporation. (CRH) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge William F. Jung and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:20-cv-2669-T-02CPT. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against George Toran, Jr with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-17550221) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Bolliger, Aldo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.