Luce v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| James Luce |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 8:2020cv02757 |
| November 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| James S Moody |
| Thomas G Wilson |
| Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 11/30/2020. (KAC)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 07/23/2010. (LSS)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (LSS) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. New case number: 8:20-cv-2757-T-30TGW. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-17582598) filed by James Luce. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons U S Attorney Tampa, #3 Proposed Summons U S Attorney Washington DC, #4 Proposed Summons Regional Chief Counsel Region IV)(Barrett, Sharon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
