Alvarez v. Dillinger et al
| Brian Casey Alvarez |
| Bernie McCabe, Samuel Boundy, Shannon Agustin and Bob Dillinger |
| 8:2020cv02868 |
| December 3, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Thomas P Barber |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT in favor of Bernie McCabe, Bob Dillinger, Samuel Boundy, Shannon Agustin against Brian Casey Alvarez. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 12/15/2020. (TDC) |
Filing 3
ORDER dismissing #1 Complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted. The Clerk is directed to enter a judgment of dismissal against Alvarez and close the case. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 12/14/2020. (SRC)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Brian Casey Alvarez. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A-1 - A-2)(CRH) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Shannon Agustin, Samuel Boundy, Bob Dillinger, Bernie McCabe filed by Brian Casey Alvarez. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A, #2 Attachment B, #3 Attachment C, #4 Attachment D, #5 Mailing Envelope)(CRH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
