Johnson v. Fitschen, et al
| Ronald Eugene Johnson |
| Fitschen, B.C., Dunn, J.L., J. L. Dunn and B. C. Fitschen |
| 8:2020cv03106 |
| December 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Steven D Merryday |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Reopen Case and Change of Address by Ronald Eugene Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(CTR) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of change of address by Ronald Eugene Johnson (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JLD) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Reopen Case by Ronald Eugene Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(JLD) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of change of address and Inmate Number by Ronald Eugene Johnson (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(CTR) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of change of address by Ronald Eugene Johnson (BES) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - Track 1. (GSO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dunn, J.L.(Individual Capacity; Deputy Police), Dunn, J.L.(Official Capacity; Deputy Police), Fitschen, B.C.(Official Capacity; Deputy Police), Fitschen, B.C.(Individual Capacity; Deputy Police) filed by Ronald Eugene Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Mailing Envelope)(Filing Fee Not Paid - No IFP Motion Filed.)(CRH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
