Campbell v. City of St. Petersburg et al
Brittany Campbell |
Justin Morales, City of St.Petersburg, Florida and City of St. Petersburg |
8:2021cv00219 |
January 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
William F Jung |
Anthony E Porcelli |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 Defendant Justin A. Morales' ANSWER and affirmative defenses with Jury Demand to #15 Amended Complaint and Dispositive Motions to Dismiss by City of St. Petersburg, Justin Morales.(MacCollom, Kenneth) Modified text on 3/22/2021 (LNR). |
Filing 18 CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Dispositive motions due by 2/7/2022, Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/12/2022 at 9:00 AM in Tampa Courtroom 15B before Judge William F. Jung, Jury Trial set for the June 2022 trial term commencing 6/06/2022 at 9:00 AM in Tampa Courtroom 15B before Judge William F. Jung, Conduct mediation hearing by 2/8/2022. Lead counsel to coordinate dates. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 3/12/2021. (SAO) |
Filing 17 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (MacCollom, Kenneth) |
Filing 16 ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot #5 and #6 Motions to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, and without prejudice to refiling as to the #15 amended complaint. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 3/8/2021. (CCB) |
Filing 15 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand. filed by Brittany Campbell.(Mattox, Marie) |
Filing 14 ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot #12 Motion and granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to #5 MOTION to Dismiss and #6 MOTION to Dismiss. Responses due by 3/5/2021. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 3/1/2021. (CCB) |
Filing 13 Amended MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Brittany Campbell. (Mattox, Marie) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Brittany Campbell. (Mattox, Marie) |
Filing 11 ENDORSED ORDER: If Plaintiff objects to the motions to dismiss, the response is overdue. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 2/26/2021. (Jung, William) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Brittany Campbell. Related case(s): Yes (Mattox, Marie) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 3 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule by Brittany Campbell. (Mattox, Marie) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by City of St. Petersburg, Justin Morales. Related case(s): Yes (MacCollom, Kenneth) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 3 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule by City of St. Petersburg, Justin Morales. (MacCollom, Kenneth) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by City of St. Petersburg. (MacCollom, Kenneth) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Justin Morales. (MacCollom, Kenneth) |
Filing 4 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SAO) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SAO) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge William F. Jung and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:21-cv-0219-T-02AEP. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pinellas County Circuit Court, case number 21-77-CI filed in State Court on 01/06/2021. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 113A-17822668 filed by Justin Morales, City of St. Petersburg. (Attachments: #1 State Court Docket Sheet, #2 State Court Other Documents, #3 State Court COMPLAINT, #4 State Court Other Documents, #5 State Court Other Documents, #6 State Court Other Documents, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(MacCollom, Kenneth) Modified on 1/29/2021 (JLD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.