Mesa v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
| Luis Mesa |
| Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. |
| 8:2021cv00260 |
| February 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Virginia M Hernandez Covington |
| Sean P Flynn |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 10/20/2021, Dispositive motions due by 11/22/2021, Plaintiff disclosure of expert report due by 6/4/2021, Defendant disclosure of expert report due by 6/24/2021, Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/1/2022 at 10:00 AM in Tampa Courtroom 11 B before Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn, Jury Trial set for 5/2/2022 at 09:00 AM in Tampa Courtroom 11 B before Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. Conduct mediation hearing by 12/20/2021. Lead counsel to coordinate dates. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn on 3/9/2021. (CKR)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER approving consent to jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 2/18/2021. (DMD)
|
| Filing 12 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Bolin, Andrew) |
| Filing 11 ***STRICKEN; DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO RULE 26.***CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (Bolin, Andrew) Modified text and image on 2/18/2021 (LNR). |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. Related case(s): No (Bolin, Andrew) Modified text on 2/18/2021 (LNR). |
| Filing 9 CONSENT to trial by U.S. Magistrate Judge by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (Bolin, Andrew) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (Bolin, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.03, which requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (TWL) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), which requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (TWL) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (TWL) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. re 2 Order no pdf. (Bolin, Andrew) |
|
Filing 3
ENDORSED ORDER: Counsel are directed to meet and confer, in person or by telephone, and by February 17, 2021, file a completed Case Management Report. The Court believes that six to eight months is a sufficient period of time to conduct discovery in the vast majority of cases. If the parties believe that more than eight months will be needed to complete discovery, the parties should provide the Court with a detailed explanation as to why additional time is needed and a timeline for the discovery that is planned. After the Case Management Report is filed, the Court will determine whether a Case Management Hearing is necessary before entry of a Case Management and Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 2/3/2021. (DMD)
|
|
Filing 2
ENDORSED ORDER: Defendant is directed to file a copy of the state court complaint on the docket as a separate docket entry by February 5, 2021. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 2/3/2021. (DMD)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pinellas County, case number 20-003044-CI filed in State Court on 06/25/2020. (Attachment(s) : #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) Filing fee $402, receipt number TPA063103 filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.(CRH) Modified on 2/3/2021 to edit text (CRH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mesa v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. | |
| Represented By: | Andrew S. Bolin |
| Represented By: | Christie Alisca |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Luis Mesa | |
| Represented By: | Matthew A. Dolman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
