Williams et al v. Transunion
| J.W., A.W., A. J., A. W., Brittany Williams and K. W. |
| Transunion |
| 8:2021cv00271 |
| February 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Steven D Merryday |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Cases associated: Create association to 8:21-cv-00003-SDM-TGW. (MCB) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #5--motion to consolidate this action with Case No. 8:21-cv-3; directing the clerk to CONSOLIDATE the relation actions and to designate 8:21-cv-3 as the lead case; directing the parties to file any motion or paper related to this action under Case No. 8:21-cv-3. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 2/18/2021. (BK)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Transunion of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint)(Long, Charlotte) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE: COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 1.08. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 2/5/2021. (GSO) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (GSO) |
| Filing 7 Case Reassigned to Judge Steven D. Merryday. New case number: 8:21-cv271-SDM-AEP. Judge Thomas P. Barber no longer assigned to the case. (AG) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Upon the consent of the Honorable Steven D. Merryday, and pursuant to Local Rule 1.07(a)(2)(B), it is hereby ordered that this case is transferred to Judge Merryday. The Clerk is directed to reassign this case to Judge Merryday for all further proceedings. It is within the purview of Judge Merryday to determine whether the cases should further be consolidated for any purposes. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 2/10/2021. (ANL)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Transunion. (Long, Charlotte) |
| Filing 4 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Thomas P. Barber and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:21-cv-271-TPB-AEP. (LRB) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Transunion. Related case(s): Yes (Long, Charlotte) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Transunion identifying Corporate Parent TransUnion, Corporate Parent TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc., Other Affiliate T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., for Transunion.. (Long, Charlotte) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of the 6th Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County, Florida, case number 20-005699-CI filed in State Court on 12/04/2020. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 113A-17851549 filed by Transunion. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Long, Charlotte) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
