Lemoine v. ESPN Productions, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Courtney Lemoine
Defendant: Broadleaf Results, Inc. and ESPN Productions, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2021cv00302
Filed: February 16, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Susan C Bucklew
Referring Judge: William F Jung
2 Judge: Anthony E Porcelli
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2021 Filing 29 NOTICE by Courtney Lemoine re #26 Order pdf Notice of Filing Answers to Court's Interrogatories (Williams, Christopher)
April 9, 2021 Filing 28 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by Broadleaf Results, Inc..(McEnery, Janet)
April 9, 2021 Filing 27 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by ESPN Productions, Inc..(Bertrand, Raymond)
March 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 26 FLSA SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Susan C. Bucklew on 3/31/2021. (CAB)
March 31, 2021 Filing 25 Case Reassigned to Judge Susan C. Bucklew. New case number: 8:21-cv-302-SCB-AEP. Judge William F. Jung no longer assigned to the case. (AG)
March 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ENDORSED ORDER granting #22 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney James P. de Haan may appear pro hac vice on behalf of Defendant ESPN Productions, Inc. Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, counsel shall comply with the fee and electronic filing requirements and file a notice of compliance with said requirements. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli on 3/30/2021. (TAM)
March 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ENDORSED ORDER: The undersigned recuses himself. The Clerk will randomly reassign this case. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 3/30/2021. (Jung, William)
March 29, 2021 Filing 22 MOTION for James P. de Haan to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. 113A-18058852 for $150 by ESPN Productions, Inc. (Bertrand, Raymond) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli.
March 29, 2021 Filing 21 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by ESPN Productions, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent The Walt Disney Company, Corporate Parent The Hearst Corporation, Corporate Parent ESPN Enterprises, Inc., Corporate Parent ESPN Inc. for ESPN Productions, Inc. (Bertrand, Raymond)
March 29, 2021 Filing 20 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by ESPN Productions, Inc. Related case(s): No (Bertrand, Raymond)
March 17, 2021 Filing 19 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 5 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule by Broadleaf Results, Inc. (McEnery, Janet)
March 17, 2021 Filing 18 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Broadleaf Results, Inc. Related case(s): No (McEnery, Janet)
March 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ENDORSED ORDER granting #14 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Raymond W. Bertrand may appear pro hac vice on behalf of Defendant ESPN Productions, Inc. Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, counsel shall comply with the fee and electronic filing requirements and file a notice of compliance with said requirements. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli on 3/16/2021. (TAM)
March 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ENDORSED ORDER granting #15 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. ESPN Productions, Inc.'s answer or response due 4/9/2021. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 3/11/2021. (CCB)
March 10, 2021 PRO HAC VICE FEES paid by attorney Raymond W. Bertrand, appearing on behalf of ESPN Productions, Inc. (Filing fee $150 receipt number TPA063390.) Related document: #14 MOTION for Raymond W. Bertrand to appear pro hac vice. (AG)
March 10, 2021 Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by ESPN Productions, Inc. (BES)
March 10, 2021 Filing 14 MOTION for Raymond W. Bertrand to appear pro hac vice by ESPN Productions, Inc. (BES) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli.
March 9, 2021 Filing 13 STIPULATION as to Equitable Tolling by Plaintiffs and All Defendants by Courtney Lemoine. (Williams, Christopher)
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ENDORSED ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to complaint. Response due by 4/9/2021. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 3/9/2021. (CCB)
March 9, 2021 Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by Broadleaf Results, Inc. (McEnery, Janet)
February 22, 2021 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #7 Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement, 5 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule Amended to include Conflict of Interest Certification by Courtney Lemoine. (Williams, Christopher)
February 22, 2021 Filing 9 RETURN of service executed on 2/17/2021 by Courtney Lemoine as to ESPN Productions, Inc. (Williams, Christopher)
February 22, 2021 Filing 8 RETURN of service executed on 2/17/2021 by Courtney Lemoine as to Broadleaf Results, Inc. (Williams, Christopher)
February 22, 2021 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 5 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule by Courtney Lemoine. (Williams, Christopher)
February 18, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SAO)
February 18, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SAO)
February 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ENDORSED ORDER granting #2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Christopher L. Williams may appear pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiff. Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, counsel shall comply with the fee and electronic filing requirements and file a notice of compliance with said requirements. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli on 2/17/2021. (TAM)
February 16, 2021 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Broadleaf Results, Inc., ESPN Productions, Inc. (JNB)
February 16, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Christopher L. Williams to appear pro hac vice by Courtney Lemoine. (JNB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli.
February 16, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Broadleaf Results, Inc., ESPN Productions, Inc. with Jury Demand filed by Courtney Lemoine. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(JNB)
February 16, 2021 FEE PAID. Fee for pro hac vice appearance, Receipt No. 113A-17888414 for $150 paid. Special Admission for Non-Resident Attorney Christopher Lane Williams. (Williams, Christopher)
February 16, 2021 FEE PAID. Filing fee for new civil case, Receipt No. 113A-17888355 for $402 paid. (Williams, Christopher)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lemoine v. ESPN Productions, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Broadleaf Results, Inc.
Represented By: Janet Goldberg McEnery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ESPN Productions, Inc.
Represented By: James P. de Haan
Represented By: Raymond W. Bertrand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Courtney Lemoine
Represented By: Christopher L. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?