Hill v. Lotane & Associates, P.A.
| Amber Hill |
| Lotane & Associates, P.A. |
| 8:2021cv00354 |
| February 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Kathryn K Mizelle |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ENDORSED ORDER: Plaintiff Amber Hill filed a #8 Joint Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice. Because it has been signed by all parties who have appeared, this stipulation is self-executing. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272, 1278 (11th Cir. 2012) ("[T]he plain language of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) requires that a stipulation filed pursuant to that subsection is self-executing and dismisses the case upon its becoming effective."). The Clerk is directed to terminate any deadlines and pending motions and to close this case. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 3/23/2021. (DMP)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal Joint (With Prejudice) by Lotane & Associates, P.A. (Kohlmyer, Ernest) Modified on 3/23/2021 to edit text (CRH). |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of settlement Pending by Amber Hill. (Diamond, Kaelyn) Modified on 3/4/2021 to edit text (CRH). |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Lotane & Associates, P.A.. (Kohlmyer, Ernest) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Lotane & Associates, P.A.. Related case(s): Yes (Kohlmyer, Ernest) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Lotane & Associates, P.A..(Kohlmyer, Ernest) |
|
Filing 3
CIVIL CASE ORDER. Counsel and any unrepresented party shall meet within forty days after the docketing of an action removed to this court for the purpose of preparing and filing a Case Management Report. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 2/16/2021. (DMP)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Kathryn K. Mizelle and Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:21-cv-0354-KKM-AAS. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 6th Judicial Circuit County Court in for Pinellas County, Florida, case number 20-008548-SC filed in State Court on 11/19/20. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 113A-17883371 filed by Lotane & Associates, P.A. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kohlmyer, Ernest) Modified text on 2/16/2021 (AG). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hill v. Lotane & Associates, P.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lotane & Associates, P.A. | |
| Represented By: | Ernest H. Kohlmyer, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amber Hill | |
| Represented By: | Kaelyn Diamond |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
