Pal v. United States Navy et al
| Leslie Pal |
| United States Marine Corp. and United States Navy |
| 8:2021cv00568 |
| March 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sean P Flynn |
| Kathryn K Mizelle |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER adopting #4 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 is DENIED. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint #1 is DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's Motion to Require Contempt of Court Money Owed #3 is DENIED as moot. The Clerk is directed to terminate all pending motions and close the case. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 4/20/2021. (NPC)
|
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis/Affidavit of Indigency filed by Leslie Pal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn on 4/2/2021. (CKR) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically to Require Contempt of Court Money Owed $48,000.00 by Leslie Pal. (JLD) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Leslie Pal. (CRH) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States Marine Corp., United States Navy filed by Leslie Pal.(CRH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
