Walker v. Clarity Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Gina Walker
Defendant: Clarity Services, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2021cv00640
Filed: March 18, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Thomas P Barber
Referring Judge: Kathryn K Mizelle
2 Judge: Thomas G Wilson
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ENDORSED ORDER: The "Joint Motion to Conduct Mediation Via Videoconferencing" (Doc. #16) is granted. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 5/10/2021. (EKB)
May 10, 2021 Filing 16 Joint MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically All Parties and Counsel to Appear via Videoconferencing at Mediation by Gina Walker. (Geiger, Bryan)
May 7, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE of mediation conference/hearing to be held on August 13, 2021 at 9:00 AM before Gregory P. Holder. (Geiger, Bryan)
April 24, 2021 Filing 14 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint by Clarity Services, Inc..(Maury, Kyle)
April 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 FCRA SCHEDULING ORDER - FAST TRACK. The parties shall mediate no later than AUGUST 21, 2021. The Court appoints Gregory P. Holder as mediator. On or before MAY 8, 2021 Plaintiff's counsel shall file a notice of mediation that states the agreed date and time of mediation. If mediation results in an impasse, the Court intends to schedule this action for trial within 90-120 days from the mediation conference. See order for further details. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 4/1/2021. (SRC)
April 1, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE to Counsel of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SRC)
March 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ENDORSED ORDER: "Defendant Clarity Services, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint" (Doc. #6) is granted. Defendant may file its response to the complaint on or before April 24, 2021. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 3/23/2021. (EKB)
March 22, 2021 Filing 10 Case Reassigned to Judge Thomas P. Barber. New case number: 8:21-cv-640-TPB-TGW. Judge Kathryn K. Mizelle no longer assigned to the case. (AG)
March 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER of recusal. Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle recused. The Clerk is directed to reassign by random draw this case to another United States District Judge. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 3/19/2021. (DMP)
March 19, 2021 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Gina Walker. (Geiger, Bryan)
March 19, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Gina Walker. Related case(s): No (Geiger, Bryan)
March 18, 2021 Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal by Clarity Services, Inc. (Maury, Kyle) Modified text on 3/19/2021 (MCB).
March 18, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Clarity Services, Inc. Related case(s): No (Maury, Kyle) Modified text on 3/19/2021 (MCB).
March 18, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Clarity Services, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Experian plc, Corporate Parent Experian Holdings, Inc. for Clarity Services, Inc.. (Maury, Kyle) Modified text on 3/19/2021 (MCB).
March 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER regarding discovery motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on 2/1/2021. (DMS)
March 18, 2021 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Kathryn K. Mizelle and Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. New case number: 8:21-cv-0640-KKM-TGW. (SJB)
March 18, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from County Court of the Tenth Judicial Circuit in and for Polk County, Florida, case number 21-SC-616 filed in State Court on 01/29/2021. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 113A-18018607 filed by Clarity Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Maury, Kyle) Modified on 3/18/2021 (JLD).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walker v. Clarity Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clarity Services, Inc.
Represented By: Kyle James Maury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gina Walker
Represented By: Bryan James Geiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?