Smith v. Inch
William C. Smith, Chancery, Appointed Trustee, William C. Smith, Grantor, Settler, John and Grantee, Qualified Beneficiary |
Mark Inch |
8:2021cv00644 |
March 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Thomas P Barber |
Anthony E Porcelli |
Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Co-Trustee's Fiduciary Obligation Abrogation by William C. Smith (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Mailing Envelope)(LD) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Disposition Notice by William C. Smith (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Mailing Envelope)(LD) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Counsel of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SRC) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Continued Exhibits by William C. Smith re #1 Complaint (Attachments: #1 Group 5: Document 24: Memorandum to Declaration of Conflict, #2 Group 5: Document 25: Declaration of Conflict, #3 Group 5: Document 26: Memorandum to Declaration of Trespass, #4 roup 5: Document 27: Declaration of Trespass, #5 Group 5: Document 28: Declaration of Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction, #6 Group 6: Document 29: Declaration of Interested Persons, #7 Group 6: Document 30: Declaration of Remedy, #8 Group 6: Document 31: Declaration of Remedy Jurisdiction, #9 Group 6: Document 32: Declaration of Equity, #10 Group 6: Document 33: Declaration of Equity Jurisdiction, #11 Group 7: Document 34: Trust Indenture Certificate Concerning Inaugural Salutations, #12 Group 7: Document 35: Allodial Title, #13 Group 7: Document 36: Certificate of Trust Conveyance, #14 Group 7: Document 37: Trust Indenture Certificate, #15 Group 7: Document 38: Allodial Title, #16 Group 7: Document 39: Certificate of Trust Conveyance, #17 Group 7: Document 40: Trust Indenture Certificate, #18 Group 7: Document 41: Allodial Title, #19 Group 7: Document 42: Certificate of Trust Conveyance, #20 Group 7: Document 43: Trust Indenture Certificate, #21 Group 8: Document 44: Allodial Title, #22 Group 8: Document 45: Certificate of Trust Conveyance, #23 Group 8: Document 46: Trust Indenture Certificate, #24 Group 8: Document 47: Allodial Title, #25 Group 8: Document 48: Certificate of Trust Conveyance, #26 Group 8: Document 49: Trust Indenture Certificate)(JLD) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mark Inch Filing fee $ 402.00, receipt number TPA063455 filed by William C. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Mailing Envelope, #3 Group 1: Document 2: Trust Instrument Recommended Reading Order Key Chart, #4 Group 1: Document 3: Trust Instrument Recommended Reading Order Flow Chart, #5 Group 1: Document 5(a): Affidavit in Support of Complaint, #6 Group 1: Document 5(b): Special Appendix, #7 Group 2: Document 6: Declaration Status, #8 Group 2: Document 7: Affidavit in Support of Trust Instruments, #9 Group 2: Document 8: Declaration of Trust, #10 Group 2: Document 9: Declaration of Trust Jurisdiction, #11 Group 3: Document 10: Compurgator Witness Statement 1, #12 Group 3: Document 11: Compurgator Witness Statement 2, #13 Group 3: Document 12: Declaration of Bracketed Words, #14 Group 3: Document 13: Declaration of Presumption Prohibition, #15 Group 4: Document 14: Conveyance of Authority to Trustee, #16 Group 4: Document 15: Acceptance of Recommendations for Trustee Appointment, #17 Group 4: Document 16: Record Seal Indenture, #18 Group 4: Document 17: Trust Indenture Certificate Concerning Notices, #19 Group 4: Document 18: Trust Indenture Certificate Concerning Suits in Chancery, #20 Group 4: Document 19: Trust Indenture Certificate Concerning Suits, #21 Group 4: Document 20: Trust Indenture Certificate Concerning Parties to Trust Suits, #22 Group 4: Document 21: Trust Indenture Certificate Concerning Affidavits, #23 Group 4: Document 22: Trust Indenture Certificate Concerning Injunctions, #24 Group 4: Document 23: Trust Indenture Certificate Concerning Restitution)(JLD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.