Beard v. Clarity Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jason Beard
Defendant: Clarity Services, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2021cv00651
Filed: March 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Susan C Bucklew
Referring Judge: Amanda Arnold Sansone
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 12/30/2021, Dispositive motions due by 2/1/2022, Pretrial Conference set for 5/5/2022 at 08:30 AM in Tampa Courtroom 10 B before Judge Susan C. Bucklew, Conduct mediation hearing by 1/14/2022. This case is set for a jury trail on the Court's June 2022 trial calendar. Signed by Judge Susan C. Bucklew on 4/28/2021. (JD)
April 26, 2021 Filing 11 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Morgan, Brandon)
April 22, 2021 Filing 10 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint by Clarity Services, Inc..(Maury, Kyle)
March 19, 2021 Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Jason Beard. (Morgan, Brandon)
March 19, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Jason Beard. Related case(s): No (Morgan, Brandon)
March 19, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES (CAB)
March 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ENDORSED ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to respond until 4/23/2021. Signed by Judge Susan C. Bucklew on 3/19/2021. (JD)
March 19, 2021 Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal by Clarity Services, Inc. (Maury, Kyle) Modified on 3/19/2021 (JLD).
March 19, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Clarity Services, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Experian plc, Corporate Parent Experian Holdings, Inc. for Clarity Services, Inc. (Maury, Kyle) Modified on 3/19/2021 (JLD).
March 19, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Clarity Services, Inc. Related case(s): No (Maury, Kyle) Modified on 3/19/2021 (JLD).
March 19, 2021 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Susan C. Bucklew and Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:21-cv-0651-SCB-AAS. (SJB)
March 19, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from County Court of the Tenth Judicial Circuit in and for Polk County, Florida, case number 21-SC-819 filed in State Court on 02/05/2021. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 113A-18021818 filed by Clarity Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Maury, Kyle) Modified on 3/19/2021 (JLD).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beard v. Clarity Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Beard
Represented By: Thomas Martin Bonan
Represented By: Brandon David Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clarity Services, Inc.
Represented By: Kyle James Maury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?