Bell v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff: WILHELMINA BELL
Defendant: NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATON and National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak
Case Number: 8:2021cv00687
Filed: March 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: William F Jung
Referring Judge: Thomas G Wilson
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Dispositive motions due by 6/1/2022. Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/13/2022 at 9:00 AM in Tampa Courtroom 15B before Judge William F. Jung. Jury Trial set for the November 2022 trial term commencing 11/7/2022 at 9:00 AM in Tampa Courtroom 15B before Judge William F. Jung. Conduct mediation hearing by 7/1/2022. Lead counsel to coordinate dates. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 5/5/2021. (SAO)
May 3, 2021 Filing 9 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Cohen, Garrison)
May 3, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Garrison Michael Cohen on behalf of National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Cohen, Garrison)
April 28, 2021 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 4 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule by Wilhelmina Bell. (Pickett, C.)
March 24, 2021 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 4 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule by National Railroad Passenger Corporation identifying Corporate Parent National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK) for National Railroad Passenger Corporation. (Fleming, Daniel)
March 24, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SAO)
March 24, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SAO)
March 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER regarding discovery motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on 2/1/2021. (DMS)
March 23, 2021 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge William F. Jung and Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. New case number: 8:21-cv-0687-WFJ-TGW. (SJB)
March 23, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Tenth Judicial Circuit, Polk County, case number 21-CA-126 filed in State Court on 01/15/2021. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 113A-18034689 filed by National Railroad Passenger Corporation. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court ANSWER, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fleming, Daniel) Modified on 3/24/2021 (JLD).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bell v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WILHELMINA BELL
Represented By: C. Robert Pickett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATON
Represented By: Daniel John Fleming
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak
Represented By: Daniel John Fleming
Represented By: Garrison Michael Cohen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?