Independent Service Provider, LLC v. Martin
Independent Service Provider, LLC |
Mike Martin |
8:2021cv00746 |
March 26, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Steven D Merryday |
Christopher P Tuite |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 NOTICE of supplemental authority re #21 Amended MOTION to Remand to State Court AMENDED AND CORRECTED, #24 Notice to take judicial notice, #26 Response in Opposition to Motion, #27 Response in Opposition to Motion, #23 MOTION to Stay re #21 Amended MOTION to Remand to State Court AMENDED AND CORRECTED, #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Independent Service Provider, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit TO MOTION TO REMAND, #2 Exhibit TO MOTION TO REMAND)(Cooper, Kenneth) |
Filing 33 NOTICE by Mike Martin re #28 MOTION to Stay Pending A Ruling From the Judicial Panel of Multidistrict Litigation and Memorandum in Support Notice of Order Granting Motion to Stay Pending Ruling From JPML (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Kuehnel, Sarah) |
Filing 32 NOTICE of a related action Amended Notice of Pendency of Related Actions per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Mike Martin. Related case(s): Yes (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Kuehnel, Sarah) |
Filing 31 ORDER granting #30--motion for extension of time to file a case management report. A separate order will schedule the case management report deadline. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 5/7/2021. (KR) |
Filing 30 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Case Management Report by Mike Martin. (Kuehnel, Sarah) |
Filing 29 NOTICE to the Courts to take judicial notice regarding #15 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Independent Service Provider, LLC. (Cooper, Kenneth) |
Filing 28 MOTION to Stay Pending A Ruling From the Judicial Panel of Multidistrict Litigation and Memorandum in Support by Mike Martin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Kuehnel, Sarah) |
Filing 27 RESPONSE in Opposition re #23 MOTION to Stay re #21 Amended MOTION to Remand to State Court AMENDED AND CORRECTED, #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Mike Martin. (Kuehnel, Sarah) |
Filing 26 RESPONSE in Opposition re #21 Amended MOTION to Remand to State Court AMENDED AND CORRECTED filed by Mike Martin. (Kuehnel, Sarah) |
Filing 25 NOTICE by Mike Martin of Filing of Motion to Transfer Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Hartzell, Maja) |
Filing 24 NOTICE to the Courts to take judicial notice regarding #21 Amended MOTION to Remand to State Court AMENDED AND CORRECTED, #23 MOTION to Stay re #21 Amended MOTION to Remand to State Court AMENDED AND CORRECTED, #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Independent Service Provider, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit jUDGE BYRON'S ORDER ON REMAND)(Cooper, Kenneth) |
Filing 23 MOTION to Stay re #21 Amended MOTION to Remand to State Court AMENDED AND CORRECTED, #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Independent Service Provider, LLC. (Cooper, Kenneth) |
Filing 22 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (KR) |
Filing 21 Amended MOTION to Remand to State Court AMENDED AND CORRECTED by Independent Service Provider, LLC. (Cooper, Kenneth) |
Filing 20 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 5 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule,,, AMENDED AND CORRECTED by Independent Service Provider, LLC. (Cooper, Kenneth) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of a related action EXHIBIT A RELATED PARTIES per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Independent Service Provider, LLC. Related case(s): Yes (Cooper, Kenneth) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of a related action AMENDED AND CORRECTED per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Independent Service Provider, LLC. Related case(s): Yes (Cooper, Kenneth) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Independent Service Provider, LLC. Related case(s): Yes (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Cooper, Kenneth) |
Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 5 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule,,, by Independent Service Provider, LLC. (Cooper, Kenneth) |
Filing 15 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Independent Service Provider, LLC. (Cooper, Kenneth) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Kenneth Donald Cooper on behalf of Independent Service Provider, LLC (Cooper, Kenneth) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Mike Martin. (Kuehnel, Sarah) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #9--motion for an extension of time: extending through 4/30/2021 the time within which Mike Martin must respond to the complaint. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 4/5/2021. (BK) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Mike Martin. Related case(s): Yes (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Kuehnel, Sarah) |
Filing 10 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Mike Martin. (Kuehnel, Sarah) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Notice of Removal by Mike Martin. (Kuehnel, Sarah) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Karen Elizabeth Smeda on behalf of Mike Martin (Smeda, Karen) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Maja Agnieszka Hartzell on behalf of Mike Martin (Hartzell, Maja) |
Filing 6 NOTICE: COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 1.08. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 2/5/2021. (KR) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c) and Local Rule 3.02(a)(2):-Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (KR) |
Filing 4 NOTICE to counsel William J. DiPetrillo of Local Rule 2.01(b)(1)(G), which requires members of the Middle District bar to register with the Middle District CM/ECF system. (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (JLD) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to counsel William J. DiPetrillo of Local Rule 2.01(a), which requires membership or special admission in the Middle District bar to practice in the Middle District, except for the limited exceptions identified in the Rule. To apply for membership in the Middle District, visit www.flmd.uscourts.gov. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (JLD) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Steven D. Merryday and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:21-cv-0746-SDM-CPT. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 12th Judicial Circuit, Sarasota County, Florida, case number 21-CA-000897 filed in State Court on 02/25/2021. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 113A-18053718 filed by Mike Martin. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings, #4 Exhibit B - State Court Notice, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Smeda, Karen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.