Lester v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Richard Lester |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 8:2021cv00848 |
| April 8, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS returned executed by Richard Lester. Commissioner of Social Security served on 4/29/2021, answer due 6/28/2021. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit with Confirmation of Delivery)(Freeman, Heather) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (JLD) |
Filing 3
ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 07/23/2010. (JLD)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:21-cv-0848-CEH-AEP. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLMDC-18112553) filed by Richard Lester. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons USAG, #3 Proposed Summons Commissioner, #4 Proposed Summons USA MD FL)(Freeman, Heather) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
