Watson v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Angela Watson |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 8:2021cv01212 |
| May 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Angela Watson. (Harris, Suzanne)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (CTR)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli on 5/20/2021. (TAM)
|
|
Filing 3
NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:21-cv-1212-CEH-AEP. Motion(s) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency . Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. (SJB)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Angela Watson. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in support of Forma Pauperis)(Harris, Suzanne)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against andrew saul filed by Angela Watson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Harris, Suzanne)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
