Bey v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
| Ra Nu Ra Khuti Amen Bey |
| Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Brian Franchio, Sharonda Shaw-Berrocal, Kare Schlutz, Brandon Regional Hospital and Karen Lynch |
| 8:2021cv01270 |
| May 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Kathryn K Mizelle |
| Thomas G Wilson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 NOTICE of Receipt of Order by Ra Nu Ra Khuti Amen Bey re #25 Order dismissing case. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(CRH) |
Filing 25
ORDER dismissing case with prejduice. The Clerk is directed to terminate all pending motions and CLOSE the case. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 7/7/2021. (NPC)
|
| Filing 24 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Brandon Regional Hospital, Brian Franchio, Karen Lynch, Kare Schlutz, Sharonda Shaw-Berrocal, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. filed by Ra Nu Ra Khuti Amen Bey.(CRH) |
| Filing 23 Unilateral CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (JLD) Modified text on 7/2/2021 (JLD). |
|
Filing 22
ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot #21 Motion for Clerk's Default in light of the dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #17). Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 7/1/2021. (NPC)
|
| Filing 21 AMENDED MOTION for Clerk's Default against Brandon Regional Hospital, Brian Franchio, Karen Lynch, Kare Schlutz, Sharonda Shaw-Berrocal, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. by Ra Nu Ra Khuti Amen Bey. (AG) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. |
| Filing 20 AMENDED PROOF of service by Ra Nu Ra Khuti Amen Bey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(AG) |
|
Filing 19
ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot #18 Motion for Hearing / Settlement Conference in the light of the dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #17). Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 6/29/2021. (NPC)
|
| Filing 18 MOTION for Hearing re #3 Order pdf by Ra Nu Ra Khuti Amen Bey. (CRH) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint no later than July 9, 2021. Failure to cure the deficiencies of the Complaint will result in this action being dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 6/25/2021. (NPC)
|
|
Filing 16
ENDORSED ORDER denying #15 Application for Default Pursuant to Local Rule 1.10(b). Plaintiff has not presented evidence that Defendants Karen Schultz and Karen Lynch have been served with the complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (providing methods of service of process); Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) (permitting entry of default only when a failure to plead or otherwise defend is shown by affidavit or otherwise). In fact, Plaintiff's #14 Proof of Service Pursuant to Local Rule 1.10(a) presents evidence that service on these defendants was NOT executed. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 6/25/2021. (NPC)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Clerk's Default against Karen Lynch, Kare Schlutz by Ra Nu Ra Khuti Amen Bey. (AG) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS returned unexecuted by Ra Nu Ra Khuti Amen Bey as to Karen Lynch, Kare Schlutz, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (AG) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Acceptance by Ra Nu Ra Khuti Amen Bey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(AG) |
| Filing 12 Motion/Affidavit Objecting to Adequacy re #9 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement. (CRH) |
| Filing 11 Plaintiff's Affidavit/Motion to Opposition re #10 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Defendant Brian Franchio's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Ra Nu Ra Khuti Amen Bey. (CRH) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Brian Franchio. (Garcia, Carlos) Modified on 6/15/2021 to edit text (CRH). |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Brian Franchio. (Garcia, Carlos) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Ra Nu Ra Khuti Amen Bey. Related case(s): No (AG) |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE disclosure statement by Ra Nu Ra Khuti Amen Bey. (AG) |
|
Filing 6
ENDORSED ORDER granting #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to the Complaint. Defendant Brian Franchio's Response is due by 6/15/2021. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 6/1/2021. (NPC)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Notice of Removal by Brian Franchio. (Garcia, Carlos) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER regarding discovery motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on 2/1/2021. (DMS)
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL CASE ORDER. Counsel and any unrepresented party shall meet within forty days after removal for the purposes of preparing and filing a Case Management Report. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 5/26/2021. (NPC)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Kathryn K. Mizelle and Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. New case number: 8:21-cv-1270-KKM-TGW. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hillsborough County, case number 21-03165 filed in State Court on 4/14/2021. Filing fee $402, receipt number AFLMDC-18293547 filed by Brian Franchio. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Other Documents, #3 Exhibit Copy of Notice of Filing to be filed in state court, #4 State Court Docket Sheet, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Garcia, Carlos) Modified on 5/26/2021 to edit text (CRH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
