Hawkins v. Santander Consumer USA et al
Plaintiff: Kenyonna Hawkins
Defendant: Santander Consumer USA and Suncoast Credit Union
Case Number: 8:2021cv01400
Filed: June 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Charlene Edwards Honeywell
Referring Judge: Thomas G Wilson
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2021 Filing 19 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Suncoast Credit Union by Kenyonna Hawkins. (Steinmetz, Yosef)
July 29, 2021 Filing 18 Amended MOTION to Dismiss Complaint for Violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act by Suncoast Credit Union. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration)(Nicholas, Daniel)
July 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ENDORSED ORDER denying without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 3.01(g) #16 Defendant's (Suncoast Credit Union) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for Violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and Supporting Memorandum of Law. The revised Local Rules require a party who moves to dismiss a claim to confer with the opposing party and include a good faith conferral certification in the motion. Local R. M.D. Fla. 3.01(g). Here, the motion lacks this conferral certification. Suncoast Credit Union, as the moving party, must file an amended motion curing this deficiency within SEVEN (7) DAYS from the date of this order; otherwise, Suncoast Credit Union must file a responsive pleading to the operative complaint within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS from the date of this order. Also, the request for oral argument within the motion violates the Local Rules. Local R. M.D. Fla. 3.01(h). Finally, Suncoast Credit Union shall ensure that any amended motion or responsive pleading complies with the typography requirements of the Local Rules. Local R. M.D. Fla. 1.08. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 7/28/2021. (GLP)
July 28, 2021 Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint for Violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act by Suncoast Credit Union. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A -Declaration)(Nicholas, Daniel)
July 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Suncoast Credit Union's answer or response due 7/28/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on 7/8/2021. (DMS)
July 8, 2021 Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Suncoast Credit Union. (Nicholas, Daniel) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson.
July 7, 2021 Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 4 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule by Santander Consumer USA identifying Corporate Parent Santander Consumer USA Holdings, Inc. for Santander Consumer USA. (Oakes, Courtney)
July 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #1 Complaint. Santander Consumer USA's answer or response due 8/6/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on 7/1/2021. (DMS)
June 30, 2021 Filing 11 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Santander Consumer USA. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Oakes, Courtney) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson.
June 30, 2021 Filing 10 RETURN of service executed on 6/18/2021 by Kenyonna Hawkins as to Suncoast Credit Union. (Steinmetz, Yosef)
June 17, 2021 Filing 9 RETURN of service executed on 06/16/2021 by Kenyonna Hawkins as to Santander Consumer USA. (Steinmetz, Yosef)
June 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDER regarding discovery motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on 2/1/2021. (DMS)
June 14, 2021 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Kenyonna Hawkins. (Steinmetz, Yosef)
June 14, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Kenyonna Hawkins. Related case(s): No (Steinmetz, Yosef)
June 10, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS)
June 10, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS)
June 10, 2021 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Santander Consumer USA, Suncoast Credit Union. (MCB)
June 10, 2021 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. New case number: 8:21-cv-1400-CEH-TGW. (SJB)
June 9, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Santander Consumer USA, Suncoast Credit Union with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLMDC-18346972) filed by Kenyonna Hawkins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons)(Steinmetz, Yosef)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hawkins v. Santander Consumer USA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Santander Consumer USA
Represented By: Courtney Oakes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Suncoast Credit Union
Represented By: Daniel Andrew Nicholas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenyonna Hawkins
Represented By: Yosef Steinmetz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?