Marcum v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Elizabeth M. Marcum
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Case Number: 8:2021cv01479
Filed: June 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Charlene Edwards Honeywell
Referring Judge: Christopher P Tuite
2 Judge: James D Whittemore
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2021 Filing 11 Proof of Service as to United States Attorney General by Elizabeth M. Marcum . (ABC) Modified text on 8/11/2021 (AG).
August 6, 2021 Filing 10 Proof of Service as to Regional Chief Counsel by Elizabeth M. Marcum. (ABC) Modified text on 8/11/2021 (AG).
August 6, 2021 Filing 9 SUMMONS returned executed by Elizabeth M. Marcum. Commissioner of Social Security served on 8/6/2021, answer due 10/5/2021. (ABC)
July 20, 2021 Filing 8 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (MCB)
July 16, 2021 Filing 7 Case Reassigned to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell. New case number: 8:21-cv-1479-CEH-CPT. Judge James D. Whittemore no longer assigned to the case. (SJB)
June 23, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Nadine Elder on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security. (Elder, Nadine)
June 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite on 6/21/2021. (AMS)
June 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway. (BES)
June 17, 2021 Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James D. Whittemore and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:21-cv-1479-JDW-CPT. Motion(s) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency . Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. (SJB)
June 17, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Elizabeth M. Marcum. (Escarraz, Enrique)
June 17, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Elizabeth M. Marcum. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Letter to Appeals Council, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Escarraz, Enrique)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marcum v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth M. Marcum
Represented By: Enrique Escarraz, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Nadine Elder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?