Armstrong v. Hunter Warfield, Inc.
| Michelle Armstrong |
| Hunter Warfield, Inc. |
| 8:2021cv01588 |
| July 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| William F Jung |
| Christopher P Tuite |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ENDORSED ORDER: Upon consideration of the #11 Stipulation of Dismissal, this case is dismissed with prejudice. Each Party agrees to bear its own fees and costs. The Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 8/2/2021. (CCB)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Michelle Armstrong. (Morgan, Brandon) |
|
Filing 10
60-DAY ORDER dismissing case in accordance with the attached order. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions/deadlines and to close the case. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 7/14/2021. (CCB)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of settlement by Michelle Armstrong (Morgan, Brandon) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 3 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule by Hunter Warfield, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent HWI Holding Inc. for Hunter Warfield, Inc. (McHale, Charles) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Hunter Warfield, Inc.(McHale, Charles) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 3 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule 3.03 by Michelle Armstrong. (Morgan, Brandon) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Michelle Armstrong. Related case(s): No (Morgan, Brandon) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SAO) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SAO) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge William F. Jung and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:21-cv-1588-WFJ-CPT. (LRB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from County Court Hillsborough County, case number 21-CC-057607 Division L filed in State Court on 05/20/2021. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AFLMDC-18430788 filed by Hunter Warfield, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court COMPLAINT, #3 State Court Other Documents Summons, #4 State Court Other Documents State Court Notice of Removal, #5 State Court Docket Sheet)(Golden, Dale) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Armstrong v. Hunter Warfield, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hunter Warfield, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Charles James McHale, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michelle Armstrong | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Martin Bonan |
| Represented By: | Brandon David Morgan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
