Panico v. 1 Group LLC
Plaintiff: Jennifer Panico
Defendant: 1 Group LLC and 1 Group LLC doing business as Stoveguard
Case Number: 8:2021cv01661
Filed: July 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: William F Jung
Referring Judge: Christopher P Tuite
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot #12 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 8/25/2021. (CCB)
August 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 60-DAY ORDER dismissing case in accordance with the attached order. The Clerk is directed to terminate pending motions/deadlines and to close the case. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 8/25/2021. (CCB)
August 25, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE of settlement by 1 Group LLC (Moskowitz, Deborah)
August 16, 2021 Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by 1 Group LLC. (Moskowitz, Deborah)
August 16, 2021 Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit In Support of Motion to Transfer)(Moskowitz, Deborah)
August 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ENDORSED ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. 1 Group LLC's answer or response due 8/16/2021. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 8/3/2021. (CCB)
August 2, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by 1 Group LLC. (Moskowitz, Deborah)
July 27, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of consent to join by Jennifer Panico . (Florin, Wolfgang)
July 27, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of consent to join by Jennifer Panico . (Florin, Wolfgang)
July 13, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Jennifer Panico. Related case(s): Yes (Florin, Wolfgang)
July 13, 2021 Filing 6 RETURN of service executed on July 13, 2021 by Jennifer Panico as to 1 Group LLC. (Florin, Wolfgang)
July 13, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SAO)
July 13, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SAO)
July 12, 2021 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to 1 Group LLC. (BES)
July 9, 2021 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge William F. Jung and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:21-cv-1661-WFJ-CPT. (SJB)
July 9, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 1 Group LLC with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLMDC-18457649) filed by Jennifer Panico. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Florin, Wolfgang)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Panico v. 1 Group LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Panico
Represented By: Wolfgang M. Florin
Represented By: Christopher D. Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 1 Group LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 1 Group LLC doing business as Stoveguard
Represented By: Deborah Lynn Moskowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?