Willard v. UFP Auburndale, LLC
Plaintiff: Lisa Willard
Defendant: UFP Auburndale, LLC
Case Number: 8:2021cv01987
Filed: August 18, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Charlene Edwards Honeywell
Referring Judge: Julie S Sneed
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2021 Filing 16 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Jennifer Monrose Moore on behalf of UFP Auburndale, LLC. Lead Counsel: Jennifer Monrose Moore, Esq. (Moore, Jennifer) Modified text on 9/29/2021 (MCB).
September 27, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie Generotti on behalf of UFP Auburndale, LLC (Generotti, Stephanie)
September 17, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by UFP Auburndale, LLC. Related case(s): No (Moore, Jennifer)
September 17, 2021 Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 4 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule by UFP Auburndale, LLC identifying Corporate Parent UFP Industries, Inc. for UFP Auburndale, LLC. (Moore, Jennifer)
September 16, 2021 Filing 12 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by UFP Auburndale, LLC.(Moore, Jennifer)
August 27, 2021 Filing 11 RETURN of service executed on 8/26/21 by Lisa Willard as to UFP Auburndale, LLC. (Harne, Alexander)
August 23, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Noah E. Storch on behalf of Lisa Willard. Lead Counsel: Noah E. Storch. (Storch, Noah)
August 20, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE to counsel of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (MCB)
August 20, 2021 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Lisa Willard. (Harne, Alexander)
August 20, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Lisa Willard. Related case(s): No (Harne, Alexander)
August 20, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexander Thomas Harne on behalf of Lisa Willard (Harne, Alexander)
August 19, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS)
August 19, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS)
August 18, 2021 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to UFP Auburndale, LLC. (MCB)
August 18, 2021 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. New case number: 8:21-cv-1987-CEM-JSS. (SJB)
August 18, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UFP Auburndale, LLC with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLMDC-18603860) filed by Lisa Willard. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Storch, Noah)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Willard v. UFP Auburndale, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa Willard
Represented By: Noah E. Storch
Represented By: Alexander Thomas Harne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UFP Auburndale, LLC
Represented By: Jennifer Monrose Moore
Represented By: Stephanie Generotti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?