Faison-Hampton v. Hart Agency
Plaintiff: Shawn H. Faison-Hampton and Sharon H. Faison-Hampton
Defendant: Hart Agency
Case Number: 8:2021cv02213
Filed: September 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Steven D Merryday
Referring Judge: Christopher P Tuite
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2021 Filing 8 RETURN of service executed on 11/8/2021 by Sharon H. Faison-Hampton as to Hart Agency. (CTR)
November 10, 2021 Filing 7 ***TERMINATED-ATTY BEHAR CAN NOT ENTER NOA ON BEHALF OF ATTY HARPER-COUNSEL NOTIFIED TO RE-FILE***NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Harper Appearance by Aaron Behar on behalf of Hart Agency (Behar, Aaron) Modified on 11/10/2021 (CTR).
November 10, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Aaron Behar on behalf of Hart Agency (Behar, Aaron)
October 27, 2021 Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to Hart Agency. (CTR)
October 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting Plaintiff's #2 construed motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite on 10/5/2021. (CTB)
September 21, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c) and Local Rule 3.02(a)(2)-Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (DAY)
September 17, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Shawn H. Faison-Hampton. (MCB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite.
September 17, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hart Agency filed by Shawn H. Faison-Hampton. (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(MCB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Faison-Hampton v. Hart Agency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawn H. Faison-Hampton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sharon H. Faison-Hampton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hart Agency
Represented By: Aaron Behar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?