Rahouski et al v. Amazon.com Services, LLC
| Dzmitry Rahouski and Alena Melnikava |
| Amazon.com Services, LLC |
| 8:2021cv02228 |
| September 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Kathryn Kimball Mizelle |
| Christopher P Tuite |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 REQUEST for waiver of Service sent to Amazon.com Services, LLC on 10/1/2021 by Dzmitry Rahouski, Alena Melnikava. (Imler, Jason) |
Filing 5
CIVIL CASE STANDING ORDER: Parties shall meet and file a Case Management Report using the standard form on the Court's website within forty days after any defendant appears. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 9/22/2021. (EDB)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Amazon.com Services, LLC. (JLD) |
| Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:21-cv-2228-KKM-CPT. (SJB) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Alena Melnikava, Dzmitry Rahouski. (Imler, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Amazon.com Service, LLC with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BFLMDC-18728766) filed by Dzmitry Rahouski, Alena Melnikava. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Imler, Jason) Modified text on 9/21/2021 (JLD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
