Banyas v. United States Postal Service
| John Banyas |
| United States Postal Service doing business as Cortez - Main Office (111830-001) |
| 8:2021cv02355 |
| October 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| James S Moody |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ENDORSED ORDER granting #11 United States' Fourth Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. The deadline for the United States to respond to the Complaint is extended to December 8, 2021. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 11/8/2021. (SMB)
|
| Filing 11 Fourth Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by United States Postal Service. (Emden, Christopher) Corrected event and notified counsel on 11/8/2021 (JLD). |
|
Filing 10
ENDORSED ORDER granting #9 United States' Third Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. The deadline for the United States to respond to the Complaint is extended to November 8, 2021. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 10/29/2021. (SMB)
|
| Filing 9 Third Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by United States Postal Service. (Emden, Christopher) Modified text on 10/29/2021 (JLD). |
|
Filing 8
ENDORSED ORDER granting #7 United States' Second Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. The deadline for the United States to respond to the Complaint is extended to November 1, 2021. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 10/27/2021. (SMB)
|
| Filing 7 Second Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #1 Complaint by United States Postal Service. (Emden, Christopher) Modified text on 10/27/2021 (JLD). |
|
Filing 6
ENDORSED ORDER granting #5 United States' Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. The deadline for the United States to respond to the Complaint is extended to October 28, 2021. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 10/15/2021. (SMB)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Complaint by United States Postal Service. (Emden, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by United States Postal Service. Related case(s): Yes (Emden, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (SMB) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:21-cv-2355-JSM-AEP. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Manatee County Circuit Court, case number 2021-CC-7005 filed in State Court on 9/21/2021. filed by United States Postal Service. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Emden, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Banyas v. United States Postal Service | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Banyas | |
| Represented By: | Drew F. Chesanek |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Postal Service doing business as Cortez - Main Office (111830-001) | |
| Represented By: | Christopher John Emden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
