Cromoty v. I.C. System, Inc.
| Erika Cromoty |
| I.C. System, Inc. |
| Gregory Holder |
| 8:2021cv02402 |
| October 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Virginia M Hernandez Covington |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of compliance re #10 Case Management / FLSA / ADA / Social Security / Scheduling Order by Erika Cromoty. (Morgan, Brandon) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of compliance re #10 Case Management / FLSA / ADA / Social Security / Scheduling Order by I.C. System, Inc. (Spengler, Sangeeta) |
Filing 13
ORDER appointing Gregory Holder as mediator in this action. The mediation conference is scheduled for January 21, 2022 at 1:30 PM. The Court directs that all counsel, parties, corporate representatives, and any other required claims professionals shall be present at the mediation conference with full authority to negotiate a settlement. The Court does not allow mediation by telephone or video conference. Personal attendance is required. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 11/8/2021. (DMD)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of mediation conference/hearing to be held on January 21, 2022 before Gregory P. Holder. (Morgan, Brandon) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by I.C. System, Inc. (Spengler, Sangeeta) |
|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER: The parties are directed to adhere to the Court's Scheduling Order. This action is hereby referred to Gregory P. Holder, Esq., for mediation. The parties must mediate no later than January 24, 2022. Lead Counsel shall file a notice of mediation informing the Court as to the date, time, and location of mediation byNovember 8, 2021. Neither party may reschedule or cancel the mediation conference once it is set; leave of Court must be obtained before the mediation conference may be rescheduled or cancelled. The parties shall not mediate until the information exchange outlined in the Scheduling Order is completed. Absent compelling circumstances and leave of Court, lead counsel must appear at the mediation conference. Lead Counsel shall file a notice informing the Court as to the results of mediation within 24 hours of the mediation conference. In the event mediation results in an impasse, the parties must file their jointly-prepared fast-track case management report within 24 hours of the mediation conference. Upon review of the jointly-prepared case management report, the Court will determine whether a case management hearing is necessary. If a case management hearing is necessitated, the Court will set the hearing by separate notice. Furthermore, if mediation results in an impasse, the Court intends to schedule this action for trial within 90-120 days from the mediation conference. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 10/28/2021. (TWL)
|
|
Filing 9
ENDORSED ORDER: The Clerk is directed to set aside the order at docket entry 8. (Doc. # 8). The Court will enter a fast-track scheduling order in this case shortly. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 10/26/2021. (DMD)
|
|
Filing 8
***SET ASIDE; pursuant to court's endorsed order 9.***ENDORSED ORDER: Counsel are directed to meet and confer, in person or by telephone, and by November 9, 2021, file a completed Case Management Report. The Court believes that six to eight months is a sufficient period of time to conduct discovery in the vast majority of cases. If the parties believe that more than eight months will be needed to complete discovery, the parties should provide the Court with a detailed explanation as to why additional time is needed and a timeline for the discovery that is planned. After the Case Management Report is filed, the Court will determine whether a Case Management Hearing is necessary before entry of a Case Management and Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 10/26/2021. (JW) Modified text on 10/27/2021 (LNR).
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by I.C. System, Inc.(Spengler, Sangeeta) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Erika Cromoty. (Morgan, Brandon) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Erika Cromoty. Related case(s): No (Morgan, Brandon) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Brandon David Morgan on behalf of Erika Cromoty. Lead Counsel: Brandon Morgan. (Morgan, Brandon) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Counsel of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (LNR) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:21-cv-2402-VMC-AEP. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from County Court Hillsborough County, case number 21-CC-098013 filed in State Court on 09/21/2021. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AFLMDC-18809759 filed by I.C. System, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents State Court Summons, #4 State Court COMPLAINT, #5 State Court Notice of Removal)(Golden, Dale) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
