Woodworth v. Axiom Acquisition Ventures, LLC et al
David Woodworth |
Axiom Acquisition Ventures, LLC, Berman & Rabin, P.A., Sequium Asset Solutions, LLC, Account Receivable Technologies, Inc. d/b/a First Credit Services, Inc. and Account Receivable Technologies, Inc. a Foreign corporation, doing business as First Credit Services, Inc. |
8:2021cv02602 |
November 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Susan C Bucklew |
Thomas G Wilson |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER regarding discovery motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on 2/1/2021. (DMS) |
Filing 3 NOTICE REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES. (CAB) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Susan C. Bucklew and Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. New case number: 8:21-cv-2602-SCB-TGW. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Account Receivable Technologies, Inc. d/b/a First Credit Services, Inc., Axiom Acquisition Ventures, LLC, Berman & Rabin, P.A., Sequium Asset Solutions, LLC (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLMDC-18898483) filed by David Woodworth. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Civil Cover Sheet, #10 Proposed Summons AAV, #11 Proposed Summons R&B, #12 Proposed Summons SAS, #13 Proposed Summons ART)(Leavengood, Ian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.