Baker v. Viehmann et al
Plaintiff: David Baker
Defendant: Andrew Viehmann and City of St. Petersburg, Florida
Case Number: 8:2021cv02851
Filed: December 7, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Susan C Bucklew
Referring Judge: Sean P Flynn
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 4, 2022 Filing 19 RESPONSE in Opposition re #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim re Counts 2, 3 and 4 CORRECTED filed by David Baker. (Hensley, Bryce)
February 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ENDORSED ORDER striking #17 Response in Opposition filed by David Baker. The response fails to conform to the font size requirements of Local Rule 1.08(a). Plaintiff is directed to refile his response in compliance that rule on or before 2/8/2022. Signed by Judge Susan C. Bucklew on 2/3/2022. (SLB)
February 1, 2022 Filing 17 RESPONSE in Opposition re #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim re Counts 2, 3 and 4 filed by David Baker. (Hensley, Bryce)
January 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ENDORSED ORDER granting #15 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Plaintiff's response to #13 Motion to Dismiss Counts 2, 3, and 4 due by 2/1/2022. Signed by Judge Susan C. Bucklew on 1/24/2022. (SLB)
January 24, 2022 Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim re Counts 2, 3 and 4 by David Baker. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Hensley, Bryce)
January 4, 2022 Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by City of St. Petersburg, Florida, Andrew Viehmann(as an agent of the City of St. Petersburg), Andrew Viehmann(in his individual capacity). (Patner, Joseph)
January 4, 2022 Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim re Counts 2, 3 and 4 by City of St. Petersburg, Florida, Andrew Viehmann(as an agent of the City of St. Petersburg), Andrew Viehmann(in his individual capacity). (Patner, Joseph)
January 4, 2022 Filing 12 Defendant's ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand Count 1 by Andrew Viehmann(as an agent of the City of St. Petersburg), Andrew Viehmann(in his individual capacity).(Patner, Joseph)
December 27, 2021 Filing 11 RETURN of service executed on 12/22/21 by David Baker as to Andrew Viehmann(in his individual capacity). (Russomanno, Herman)
December 22, 2021 Filing 10 RETURN of service executed on 12/14/2021 by David Baker as to City of St. Petersburg, Florida. (Russomanno, Herman)
December 10, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of compliance with December 8, 2021 by David Baker (Hensley, Bryce)
December 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ENDORSED ORDER granting #6 the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Bryce T. Hensley is directed to sign up for CM/ECF, enter an email address in his CM/ECF account, and electronically file a notice of compliance with this Court's Order by 1/7/22. The Clerk is directed not to send paper copies to him after sending this Order. Signed by Judge Susan C. Bucklew on 12/8/2021. (DMB)
December 8, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Herman J. Russomanno, III on behalf of David Baker. Lead Counsel: Bryce T. Hensley. (Russomanno, Herman)
December 8, 2021 Filing 6 MOTION for Bryce T. Hensley to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-19006412 for $150 by David Baker. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Russomanno, Herman)
December 8, 2021 Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to City of St. Petersburg, Florida, Andrew Viehmann. (BD)
December 8, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE to counsel Bryce T. Hensley of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD)
December 8, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES (CAB)
December 8, 2021 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Susan C. Bucklew and Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. New case number: 8:21-cv-2851-SCB-SPF. (SJB)
December 7, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLMDC-19003178) filed by David Baker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons)(Russomanno, Herman)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Baker v. Viehmann et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Baker
Represented By: Herman J. Russomanno, III
Represented By: Bryce Thomas Hensley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Viehmann
Represented By: Joseph P. Patner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of St. Petersburg, Florida
Represented By: Joseph P. Patner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?