Coney v. Fowler et al
| Early Coney |
| Jason Fowler, G. Nelson, Mark Buswell, James Bradford, Rick A. Lott and W. Harvester |
| 8:2021cv02854 |
| December 8, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
| Christopher P Tuite |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER granting Defendants' #12 Amended Motion for More Definite Statement. No later than February 25, 2022, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint, which cures the deficiencies discussed in the Order and which otherwise satisfies the applicable requirements in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Court's Local Rules. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite on 2/3/2022. (ACL)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER: If all parties desire to consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge for all proceedings, this form must be filed with the Clerk on or before February 16, 2022. If not received by this time, this case will be placed on the District Judge's calendar. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 2/2/2022. (BGS)
|
|
Filing 13
CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Scarritt, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 12
Amended MOTION for More Definite Statement by James Bradford, Jason Fowler, W. Harvester, Rick A. Lott, G. Nelson. (Scarritt, Thomas) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite.
|
|
Filing 11
ENDORSED ORDER denying without prejudice Defendants' #10 Motion for More Definite Statement. It appears from the motion that defense counsel has not satisfied the requirements of Local Rule 3.01(g). Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite on 12/22/2021. (ACL)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION for More Definite Statement by James Bradford, Jason Fowler, W. Harvester, Rick A. Lott, G. Nelson. (Scarritt, Thomas) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite.
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by James Bradford, Jason Fowler, W. Harvester, Rick A. Lott, G. Nelson. Related case(s): Yes (Scarritt, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE by James Bradford, Jason Fowler, W. Harvester, Rick A. Lott, G. Nelson of Disclosure Statement (Scarritt, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Thomas P. Scarritt on behalf of James Bradford, Jason Fowler, W. Harvester, Rick A. Lott, G. Nelson. Lead Counsel: Thomas P. Scarritt, Jr. (Scarritt, Thomas) Modified text on 12/16/2021 (MCB).
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE to Defense Counsels of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD)
|
|
Filing 3
NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:21-cv-2854-CEH-CPT. (SJB)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Removal of Defendant James Bradford by James Bradford (Scarritt, Thomas) Modified on 12/8/2021 to correct docket text (BD).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Thirteenth Judicial Circuit of Hillsborough County, case number 21-CA-008916 filed in State Court on 11/08/2021. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number BFLMDC-19003587 filed by Rick A Lott. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 State Court Docket Sheet Docket Sheet, #4 State Court Other Documents Notice of Removal)(Scarritt, Thomas)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
