Wadi v. Tampa Electric Company
| Ala Wadi |
| Tampa Electric Company |
| 8:2021cv02866 |
| December 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Thomas P Barber |
| Thomas G Wilson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ENDORSED ORDER: In light of the amended complaint (Doc. #17), Defendant's "Motion to Dismiss Complaint" (Doc. #13) is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 2/3/2022. (ANL)
|
| Filing 17 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Tampa Electric Company with Jury Demand. filed by Ala Wadi. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Ala Wadi.(Hill, Brandon) |
| Filing 16 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Hill, Brandon) |
| Filing 15 AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Tampa Electric Company. (Adams, David) Modified text on 1/24/2022 (ABC). |
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Tampa Electric Company. (Adams, David) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by Tampa Electric Company. (Adams, David) |
|
Filing 12
ENDORSED ORDER: Defendant's "Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Complaint" (Doc. #11) is granted. Defendant may file its response to the complaint on or before January 20, 2022. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 1/18/2022. (ANL)
|
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Tampa Electric Company. (Adams, David) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Ala Wadi. (Hill, Brandon) |
| Filing 9 RETURN of service executed on December 16, 2021 by Ala Wadi as to Tampa Electric Company. (Hill, Brandon) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by David W. Adams on behalf of Tampa Electric Company (Adams, David) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE to Counsel of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SRC) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Brandon J. Hill on behalf of Ala Wadi. Lead Counsel: Brandon J. Hill. (Hill, Brandon) |
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER regarding discovery motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on 2/1/2021. (DMS)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Tampa Electric Company. (BD) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Plaintiff's Counsels of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Thomas P. Barber and Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. New case number: 8:21-cv-2866-TPB-TGW. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tampa Electric Company with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLMDC-19011474) filed by Ala Wadi. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Hill, Brandon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wadi v. Tampa Electric Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ala Wadi | |
| Represented By: | Amanda E. Heystek |
| Represented By: | Brandon J. Hill |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tampa Electric Company | |
| Represented By: | David W. Adams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
