Biro v. AlliedBarton Security Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Joseph Biro
Defendant: Allied Barton Security Services, LLC and AlliedBarton Security Services, LLC
Case Number: 8:2021cv02952
Filed: December 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Virginia M Hernandez Covington
Referring Judge: Sean P Flynn
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ENDORSED ORDER: On the basis of the Notice of Settlement (Doc. #19), this cause is hereby dismissed, without prejudice and subject to the right of the parties, within 60 days of the date hereof, to submit a stipulated form of final order or judgment, or request an extension of time, should they so choose or for any party to move to reopen the action, upon good cause being shown. After that 60 day period, however, without further order, this dismissal shall be deemed with prejudice. Furthermore, the Court advises the parties that "good cause" exists to reopen an action when a settlement agreement has yet to be finalized because of various delays. But incomplete performance of an executed settlement agreement, such as the failure to disburse settlement funds, does not constitute good cause to reopen an action. This Court does not retain jurisdiction to ensure performance of a settlement agreement because such failure to perform should be addressed in a separate breach of contract action. The Clerk is directed to terminate any previously scheduled deadlines and thereafter close this case. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 2/4/2022. (DMD)
February 4, 2022 Filing 19 NOTICE of settlement by Joseph Biro (Rotstein, Jonathan)
January 26, 2022 Filing 18 AMENDED COMPLAINT First Amended against Joseph Biro with Jury Demand. filed by Joseph Biro.(Rotstein, Jonathan)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER regarding motions for summary judgment. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 1/19/2022. (TWL)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ENDORSED ORDER: In light of the Court's Case Management and Scheduling Order (Doc. #15), no case management hearing will be held. Additionally, in order to keep cases moving on track, the Court has found it necessary to impose some restrictions on the types and number of extensions to case management deadlines that it grants. Thus, the parties are advised that, while short extensions, especially if unopposed, will be favorably considered, the Court will not substantially move the dispositive motions deadline or the trial date. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 1/19/2022. (TWL)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/8/2022 at 9:00 AM in Tampa Courtroom 14 B before Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington, Jury Trial set for the January 2023 trial term in Tampa Courtroom 14 B before Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington. Conduct mediation hearing by 7/14/2022. Lead counsel to coordinate dates. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 1/18/2022. (TWL)
January 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ENDORSED ORDER granting the unopposed motion to amend the complaint. (Doc. #13). Plaintiff is directed to file the amended complaint by January 28, 2022. In light of the anticipated filing of the amended complaint, the motion to dismiss the complaint (Doc. #4) is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 1/14/2022. (DMD)
January 14, 2022 Filing 13 MOTION to Amend Complaint by Joseph Biro. (Rotstein, Jonathan)
January 13, 2022 Filing 12 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Eisenlohr-Moul, Kelly)
December 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ENDORSED ORDER: Counsel are directed to meet and confer, in person or by telephone, and by January 13, 2022, file a completed Case Management Report. The Court believes that six to eight months is a sufficient period of time to conduct discovery in the vast majority of cases. If the parties believe that more than eight months will be needed to complete discovery, the parties should provide the Court with a detailed explanation as to why additional time is needed and a timeline for the discovery that is planned. After the Case Management Report is filed, the Court will determine whether a Case Management Hearing is necessary before entry of a Case Management and Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 12/30/2021. (DMD)
December 28, 2021 Filing 10 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by AlliedBarton Security Services, LLC identifying Corporate Parent AlliedBarton Security Services LLC for AlliedBarton Security Services, LLC. (Eisenlohr-Moul, Kelly)
December 28, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.03, which requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (TWL)
December 28, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), which requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (TWL)
December 28, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (TWL)
December 28, 2021 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Joseph Biro. (Rotstein, Jonathan)
December 27, 2021 Filing 5 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by AlliedBarton Security Services, LLC identifying Corporate Parent AlliedBarton Security Services LLC for AlliedBarton Security Services, LLC. (Eisenlohr-Moul, Kelly)
December 27, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by AlliedBarton Security Services, LLC. (Eisenlohr-Moul, Kelly)
December 27, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Rule 26 Disclosure by Joseph Biro (Rotstein, Jonathan) Modified on 12/27/2021 DOCUMENT TERMINATED, Discovery (BES).
December 21, 2021 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington and Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. New case number: 8:21-cv-2952-VMC-SPF. (SJB)
December 20, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE by Allied Barton Security Services, LLC of Removal from State Court (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Eisenlohr-Moul, Kelly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Biro v. AlliedBarton Security Services, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Biro
Represented By: Jonathan Isaac Rotstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Allied Barton Security Services, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AlliedBarton Security Services, LLC
Represented By: Kelly Elisabeth Eisenlohr-Moul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?