Occhipinti et al v. Monsanto Company
Plaintiff: Connie Occhipinti and Stuart Hurry
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Case Number: 8:2022cv00027
Filed: January 4, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Kathryn Kimball Mizelle
Referring Judge: Amanda Arnold Sansone
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2022 Acknowledgment - Transferred case has been opened in the California Northern District as case 3:22-cv-00470, filed 01/24/2022.(JNB)
January 24, 2022 Filing 9 MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION PANEL ORDER (CTO-310) transferring case to: Northern District of California re MDL case number: 2741. (AG)
January 13, 2022 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #3 Order pdf by Stuart Hurry, Connie Occhipinti. (Grinder, Austin)
January 13, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of a related action MDL No 2741 per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Stuart Hurry, Connie Occhipinti. Related case(s): Yes (Grinder, Austin)
January 13, 2022 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of service by Stuart Hurry, Connie Occhipinti re #4 Summons issued January 5, 2022. (Grinder, Austin)
January 5, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE to Plaintiff's Counsels of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD)
January 5, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Monsanto Company. (BD)
January 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING CIVIL CASE ORDER. The parties shall meet and file a Case Management Report using the standard form on the Court's website within 40 days after Defendant appears. Signed by Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle on 1/5/2022. (EDB)
January 4, 2022 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle and Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:22-cv-0027-KKM-AAS. (SJB)
January 4, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Monsanto Company with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLMDC-19083011) filed by Connie Occhipinti, Stuart Hurry. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Grinder, Austin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Occhipinti et al v. Monsanto Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Connie Occhipinti
Represented By: Austin Johnson Grinder
Represented By: Eric D. Roslansky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stuart Hurry
Represented By: Austin Johnson Grinder
Represented By: Eric D. Roslansky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?