Jimenez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
David Jimenez |
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Steven Bingham, Robin Lynne Allweiss, Sandra Y. Rhodes, Equifax Legal Department, Capital One Legal Department, Elizabeth Gonzales Franco, Discover Bank Legal Department, Dana M. DiSano, Bank of America Legal Department, American Express Legal Department, AT&T Mobility Legal Department, Chase Bank Legal Department, Nathan T. Vonderbeide and Bruce G. Howie |
8:2022cv00072 |
January 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Mary S Scriven |
Julie S Sneed |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER dismissing without prejudice the claim against Detective Steven Bingham; dismissing with prejudice the claims against the remaining defendants; denying as moot Jimenez's #2 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 4/27/2022. (JT) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by David Jimenez. (RDO) Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by David Jimenez. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2, #3 Mailing Envelope)(RDO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.