Melendy v. Cerna et al
| Mitchel Melendy and Mitchel Anthony Melendy |
| FNA Cerna, FNU Stewart, FNU Perez, Chris Nocco, Sheriff Administration, E. Elen, FNU Smith and Trinity Commissary |
| 8:2022cv00127 |
| January 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Mary S Scriven |
| Julie S Sneed |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER striking #1 Complaint and denying without prejudice #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Within THIRTY DAYS of this order, Melendy must file an amended complaint on the standard prisoner civil rights form and either pay the filing fee or file a fully completed "Prisoner Consent and Financial Certificate" form. The clerk must send to Melendy a "Prisoner Consent and Financial Certificate" form and a prisoner civil rights complaint form. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 3/11/2022. (KMG)
|
| Filing 2 CONSTRUED MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Mitchel Melendy. (LD) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. |
| Filing 1 ***STRICKEN PURSUANT TO DKT. 3 ORDER*** COMPLAINT against FNA Cerna, E. Elen, Chris Nocco, FNU Perez, Sheriff Administration, FNU Smith, FNU Stewart, Trinity Commissary filed by Mitchel Melendy. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LD) Modified on 3/11/2022 (LD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
